How Do You Calculate the Volume of Liquid in a Partially Filled Conical Glass?

skiing4free
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
This is a problem that my lecturer gave us in class and it has been bugging me ever since. I have been unsuccesful in finding or calculating a proper solution so I am hoping PF will be able to help...

This is the Q:

Let H be the height of a conical glass which is filled to a height h. Find the volume of the liquid in the glass as a proportion of the volume if the glass is full. Find the ratio h/H for which the glass is half full.
To answer this question you must construct a mathematical model defining all the variables.

This does not sound like a difficult question to solve but whenever I try to solve with simple conical volume equations I just get that the ratio is H:2h which is obviously not right. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why don't you explain how you got H:2h?
 
Well the formula for a volume of a cone is:
V=1/3*pi*r^2*H.

V1 which is the volume of the full cone and V2 is the volume of the half full cone it is clear that V1/2=V2. I put the volume equations into this with the two differnt heights and when the constants are removed (pi, 1/3) you are left with H=2h. ahh but i have just seen how the radius would of course change... Now I think I am more confused
 
Can you find a relationship between what the radius and the height is going to be when you're at a certain height up the cone? (hint: think similar triangles)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top