How Do You Convert a Density Operator to Matrix Form?

PatsyTy
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Write the density operator

$$\rho=\frac{1}{3}|u><u|+\frac{2}{3}|v><v|+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3}(|u><v|+|v><u|, \quad where <u|v>=0$$

In matrix form

Homework Equations



$$\rho=\sum_i p_i |\psi><\psi|$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The two first factors ##\frac{1}{3}|u><u|## and ##\frac{2}{3}|v><v|## pertain to the diagonal elements of the 2x2 matrix, I am unsure how to find the off diagonal elements for this matrix and the ##|u><v|## and ##|v><u|## I don't think are included in the sum I listed in the relevant equations.

In matrix form I have

$$\rho=
\left( \begin{array}{cc}
1 & ? \\
? & 2 \end{array} \right)$$

I have the suspicion that $$\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3}$$ is the offdiagonal elements, however, I don't want to put this down just off of my suspicion. Any tips, or things to think of for me would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is nothing deep to be appreciated here. Its just that u and v are somehow serving as the matrix indices. So uu and vv are the diagonal elements and uv and vu are the off-diagonal elements.
 
ShayanJ said:
There is nothing deep to be appreciated here. Its just that u and v are somehow serving as the matrix indices. So uu and vv are the diagonal elements and uv and vu are the off-diagonal elements.

Thank you, that is what I suspected. How do these cross terms arise from the equation

$$\rho=\sum_i p_i|\psi_i><\psi_i$$

It seems that these cross terms do not come from this summation as it is over only one index.
 
The states in that formula are not the base states. That definition is for when you want to assign classical probabilities for the system to be in different states that are not necessarily orthogonal. The off-diagonal terms arise when you expand those states in terms of orthonormal base states.
 
  • Like
Likes PatsyTy
ShayanJ said:
The states in that formula are not the base states. That definition is for when you want to assign classical probabilities for the system to be in different states that are not necessarily orthogonal. The off-diagonal terms arise when you expand those states in terms of orthonormal base states.

Thank you, that makes sense!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top