Engineering How Do You Convert Voltage and Current Into Phasors for Circuit Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
To convert voltage and current into phasors for circuit analysis, the real part of the phasor represents the physical voltage. The confusion arises from whether to express voltage as 25e^{j(1000t)} or 25e^{0}, with the correct approach being to use the real part when reverting to cosine form. The imaginary part of the phasor is ignored in practical applications, as it does not represent a physical quantity. For an RLC circuit analysis, it is essential to consider the impedances of all components when applying Ohm's law, ensuring consistent units throughout calculations. Understanding these principles clarifies the conversion process and the role of phasors in circuit analysis.
PenDraconis
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have ##V = 25cos(1000t)## and ##I = Acos(1000t)## for a circuit, I'd like to make those into phasors.

Homework Equations


##V = Acos(\omega t+\theta)## ##\leftrightarrow## ##V = Ae^{j\theta}##

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems like this is relatively simple, but that seems to be my problem, these are my two confusions:

##V = 25cos(1000t) = 25e^{j(1000t)}## ?​

Or is it:

##V = 25cos(1000t) = 25e^{0}## ?​

I'm not quite sure which route to go towards, could anyone possible point me towards the right direction or explain why it's one over the other? My main confusion is that if I change ##V = 25e^{j(1000t)}## back into it's cosine and sine components (using Euler's Identity) I end up with:
##V = 25cos(1000t)+jsin(1000t)##​
...is the imaginary part ignored?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##V = Acos(\omega t+\theta)## ##\leftrightarrow## ##V = Ae^{j\theta}##
What does Euler's identity say about this part?
 
PenDraconis said:

Homework Statement



I have ##V = 25cos(1000t)## and ##I = Acos(1000t)## for a circuit, I'd like to make those into phasors.

Homework Equations


##V = Acos(\omega t+\theta)## ##\leftrightarrow## ##V = Ae^{j\theta}##

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems like this is relatively simple, but that seems to be my problem, these are my two confusions:

##V = 25cos(1000t) = 25e^{j(1000t)}## ?​

Or is it:

##V = 25cos(1000t) = 25e^{0}## ?​
I am not sure what is your reasoning here. These two cannot be equal as the left side is a function of time and not the right side.
I'm not quite sure which route to go towards, could anyone possible point me towards the right direction or explain why it's one over the other? My main confusion is that if I change ##V = 25e^{j(1000t)}## back into it's cosine and sine components (using Euler's Identity) I end up with:
##V = 25cos(1000t)+jsin(1000t)##​
...is the imaginary part ignored?

You are right that there is a point that sometimes people do not explain well enough (or not at all). The key point is that the physical voltage is the real part of the corresponding phasor . So yes, in going from the phasor back to the actual voltage, one must drop the imaginary part.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
You are right that there is a point that sometimes people do not explain this point well enough (or not at all). The key point is that the physical voltage is the real part of the corresponding phasor . So yes, in going from the phasor back to the actual voltage, one must drop the imaginary part.

Thank you! I was just confused as to why this point was glossed over whenever I mentioned it in class, I wasn't able to ever get a straight answer.

The second part of the circuit I seem to understand, basically I have a RLC circuit and I must used phasor analysis to find the capacitance given R = 3, L = ##j4##, C =##\frac{-j}{1000C}##, ##V = 25e^{j1000t}##, ##I = Ae^{j1000t}##. It's simply finding the total resistance of the circuit and plugging that into a V = IR equation to find the value of C.
 
Last edited:
PenDraconis said:
Thank you! I was just confused as to why this point was glossed over whenever I mentioned it in class, I wasn't able to ever get a straight answer.

The second part of the circuit I seem to understand, basically I have a RLC circuit and I must used phasor analysis to find the capacitance given R = 3, L = ##j4##, C =##\frac{-j}{1000C}##, ##V = 25e^{j1000t}##, ##I = Ae^{j1000t}##. It's simply finding the total resistance of the circuit and plugging that into a V = IR equation to find the value of C.

Well, you cannot simply use Ohm's law. You also need to add the impedance of the inductor and of the capacitor. Can you calculate those? If the three elements are in series, you simply have
V = (R+ X_C + X_L) I and solve. Watch out for the units, they must be consistent.
 
nrqed said:
Well, you cannot simply use Ohm's law. You also need to add the impedance of the inductor and of the capacitor. Can you calculate those? If the three elements are in series, you simply have
V = (R+ X_C + X_L) I and solve. Watch out for the units, they must be consistent.

Yup! You're right.

Those are the impedances I gave. The resistor and inductor are in series and they're both in parallel with the capacitor.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top