How Do You Determine the Best Value of β in L-S Coupling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tasos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupling
tasos
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[/B]
We have that the three lowest energy states of a system are $$ ^3F_2, ^3F_3, ^3F_4 $$ (these are the Term symbols) with relative energy gap $$0,\ 171,\ 387 \ cm^{-1}$$
Now using the perturbation $$H_{LS}=\beta \ \vec{L}\cdot \vec{S}$$ i have to find the best value of the parameter β that fits best with the energy gaps.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
As i read fine structure is responsible for splitting $$ ^3F$$ into the 3 degenerate states $$ ^3F_2, ^3F_3, ^3F_4 $$

I calculate the term $$\langle\ \vec{L}\cdot \vec{S} \rangle = \ \vec{J}(\ \vec{J} + 1) -\ \vec{L}(\ \vec{L}+1) -\ \vec{S}(\ \vec{S}+1) $$

So now we have that $$E_{LS} = \frac{\beta}{2}( \ \vec{J}(\ \vec{J} + 1) -\ \vec{L}(\ \vec{L}+1) -\ \vec{S}(\ \vec{S}+1) )$$
So we see the splitting:

$$E_{^3F_3} - E_{^3F_2} = 2\beta$$
$$E_{^3F_4} - E_{^3F_3} = \beta$$

The first abstraction give the value $$\beta =85.5$$
The second abstraction gives the valut $$\beta = 108$$

So if all the above are correct what's the best value of the parameter β that fits best with the energy gaps?Thnx.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You shouldn't have removed the other sections of the templates. You are required to follow the template as it's in the guideline of Homework section and also because no one is supposed to provide help before the poster posts his own effort.
 
tasos said:
So we see the splitting:

$$E_{^3F_3} - E_{^3F_2} = 2\beta$$
$$E_{^3F_4} - E_{^3F_3} = \beta$$
You seemed to be making mistakes when calculating the energy difference in terms of ##\beta##. For instance, in calculating ##
E_{^3F_3} - E_{^3F_2}##, the terms containing ##L## and ##S## in each energy expressions will cancel because the two states have the same values for those quantum numbers. Only the terms containing ##J## will contribute, the first term has ##J=3## and second term has ##J=2##.

Also take care of which system of unit you are using. If you use atomic unit in which ##\hbar=1##, you should also convert the given energy difference (in terms of wave number) into atomic unit of energy.
 
Ok sorry. So here the energy interval between adjacent J levels is

$$ΔE_{FS}= E_J -E_{J-1}= \beta J$$So for J=4 we have $$ ΔE_{FS}= E_4 -E_{3} = 4 \beta $$ so here $$ \beta =42,75 cm^−1$$
and for J=3 we have $$ΔE_{FS}= E_3 -E_{2} = 3 \beta$$ so here $$ \beta =72 cm^−1$$ANd if I am correctly how i decide the best value of β
 
Ignoring any common constant factors in energies and the units, for ##E_4-E_3##,
$$
\beta = \frac{E_4-E_3}{4} = \frac{171}{4} = ?
$$
while for ##E_3-E_2##,
$$
\beta = \frac{E_3-E_2}{3} = \frac{387-171}{3} = ?
$$
The two ##?##'s obtained from the two energy differences are alike, as they should be. It appears really strange to me that you keep getting very different values of ##\beta##.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top