How Do You Determine the Eigenstate of S_x with Eigenvalue +ħ/2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter indigojoker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Component Spin
indigojoker
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
We know that S_x = \frac{\hbar}{2} \left( |+ \rangle \langle - | + | - \rangle \langle+| \right)

But what is |S_x ; + \rangle?

I think my text says |S_x ; + \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( |+ \rangle + | - \rangle \right) but i don't know how they got this.

I feel like this is a trivial question but I'm not sure how one finds |S_x ; + \rangle
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But WHAT is |S_{x},+\rangle ?? I've never seen this notation before...And it's not that I've looked into one book...:rolleyes: I haven't looked in your book, apparently, you might share with us the title and the author...
 
I imagine that it's the positive spin direction for S_x.

OP: it's just an eigenvector -- so you find it in the same way that you find any eigenvectors. If it helps, write S_x as a matrix, in the |+>, |-> basis that you've got things in.
 
I just figured it out.

I am using * as the dot product

S * \hat n | S * \hat n ; + \rangle = \frac{ \hbar}{2} | S * \hat n ; + \rangle
| S * \hat n ; + \rangle = \cos \frac{\beta}{2} |+ \rangle + \sin \frac{\beta}{2} e^{i \alpha} | - \rangle

where beta is the polar angle and alpha is the azimuthal angle.

therefore, an S_x measurement would be where beta = pi/2 and alpha =0

since the S_x measurement would yield +hbar/2, we get:

| S_x; + \rangle = \cos \frac{\pi/2}{2} |+ \rangle + \sin \frac{\pi/2}{2} e^{0} | - \rangle

therefore:
|S_x ; + \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( |+ \rangle + | - \rangle \right)
 
Last edited:
indigojoker said:
We know that S_x = \frac{\hbar}{2} \left( |+ \rangle \langle - | + | - \rangle \langle+| \right)

But what is |S_x ; + \rangle?

I think my text says |S_x ; + \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( |+ \rangle + | - \rangle \right) but i don't know how they got this.

I feel like this is a trivial question but I'm not sure how one finds |S_x ; + \rangle

They want the state which is an eigenstate of Sx with the eigenvalue +hbar/2.

So you could write |S_x ; + \rangle = \alpha <br /> |+ \rangle + \beta |- <br /> \rangle

and apply S_x, imposing S_x |S_x; + &gt; = \frac{\hbar}{2} |S_x;+&gt; and then solve for alpha and beta (and normalize at the end)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top