How Do You Find the Maclaurin Series for e^(x^3)?

NickMusicMan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am studying for an exam, and I am trying to figure out:

if you have something like e^(x^3), can you simply substitute x^3 into the M-series for e^x and get the M-series for e^(x^3)? Or would you have to cube the whole e^x series? I have encountered mixed responses to this question.

This is from a practice problem but I am wondering, in general how can you handle ones like f(g(x)), where f has a known expansion.

Thanks,

-NN
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can simply substitute x^3 in for x, but remember that the radius of convergence needs to be taken into account. I.e, if f(x) converges for |x| < 2, then f(x^3) would converge for |x^3| < 2.

Try it out though. You can compute the Taylor series from the definition, and then by substituting. They should be equal.
 
NickMusicMan said:
I am studying for an exam, and I am trying to figure out:

if you have something like e^(x^3), can you simply substitute x^3 into the M-series for e^x and get the M-series for e^(x^3)? Or would you have to cube the whole e^x series? I have encountered mixed responses to this question.
Cubing ex doesn't give you ex3. It gives you e3x.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top