How do you find the uncertainty of an average?

AI Thread Summary
To find the uncertainty of an average from multiple measurements, a weighted average approach is recommended, where more precise values are given greater weight based on their uncertainties. The initial calculations resulted in an average of 15.38, but using the correct method yields an average of 15.50 with an uncertainty of 0.20. The professor's initial suggestion of 1.0956 for uncertainty was deemed incorrect, as it implied that more measurements would decrease accuracy. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately accounting for uncertainties in experimental data. Properly applying the weighted average method leads to a more reliable result.
Student2018
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I used a spectrometer in class and obtained 6 angles in which and found the angles. I needed to find the average of the angles and account for the uncertainties here is what I did:

Center (A): 179.58°±.26 Center (B): 359.35°±.26
Purple(RA): 194.95°±.66 Purple (RB): 374.32°±.66
Purple(LA): 163.97°±.17 Purple (LB): 343.83°±.17

Homework Equations


Average= (x1+x2+x3+x4)/4
dc=sqrt[(da)^2+(db)^2]

The Attempt at a Solution


1.C(A) - P(RA) = 179.58-194.95 = 15.37±.71
2.C(B) - P(RB) = 359.35-374.32 = 14.97±.71
3.C(A) - P(LA) = 179.58-163.97 = 15.61±.31
4.C(B) - P(LB) = 359.35-343.83 = 15.52±.31

where I got the uncertainties like so:
dc(1)=sqrt[(.26)^2+(.66)^2]= .71

dc(3)=sqrt[(.26)^2+(.17)^2]= .31

I needed to get the average of all the numbers
Average= (15.37+14.97+15.61+15.52)/4 = 15.38

I talked to the professor and he wanted me to use
dt=sqrt[(.71)^2+(.71)^2+(.31)^2+(.31)^2]= 1.0956

My question is, is it 1.0956 or is it (1.0956/4) = .274?
(Sorry if it was long)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Student2018 said:
dt=sqrt[(.71)^2+(.71)^2+(.31)^2+(.31)^2]= 1.0956
That is clearly wrong since it would say the more measurements you take the less accurate your result.

If you have a number of readings of the same quantity but with different uncertainties on each, the ideal is to use a weighted average to find the mean. The more precise values need to be given greater weight.
The weighting is 1/σi2. In this case you should get 15.50 rather than 15.38.
The uncertainty in that average goes like σ-2=Σσi-2. For that I get σ=0.20.
 
Last edited:
I see, thank you. That uncertainty would make a lot more sense than 1.0956 which is way too high of a range.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top