How do you prove that ln(a^x) = xln(a) and a^x = e^xln(a) without using exponent rules?

  • #1
logicgate
6
1
Homework Statement
The proof must contain all real numbers x, not just for integers, it must be true for rational and irrational numbers.
Relevant Equations
ln(a^x) = xln(a), a^x = e^xln(a)
In the book "Calculus by Michael Spivak" it says that a^x = e^xln(a) is a definition. And I am not convinced to accept this as true without a proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You want to define ##a^x## for any real number ##x##. I suppose we can assume ##a\geq 0## for otherwise, we would get into trouble already with rational values of ##x.## I know what ##a^z## for ##z\in \mathbb{Z}## is since we can define it recursively. That allows us to define ##a^{1/n}=\sqrt[n]{a}## since an ##n## long product of them yields ##1.## We get therefore the definition for all ##x\in \mathbb{Q}.##

Now, it gets complicated. The real numbers are limits of certain sequences of rational numbers. Say we have ##x=\displaystyle{\lim_{n \to \infty}}x_n## and we require that ##x \mapsto a^x## is continuous. We need this condition so that we can define ##a^x= \displaystyle{\lim_{n \to \infty}}a^{x_n}.## The requirement makes sense if we look at the drawings of ##x_n \mapsto a^{x_n}.## However, it is an artificial requirement in the sense that we can only get from the rational to the reals if we accept a topological homomorphism, a continuous function.

Thus, we have defined ##a^x## by algebraic and topological means, that mimic the process from natural numbers over integers and rational numbers to real numbers.

So far so good. Now, what are ##x\mapsto e^x## and ##a\mapsto \ln(a)##? You have to define them before we prove the statement. For example, their definition by functional equations is possibly less helpful than their definition by power series or limits. So what are they to you? In order to prove something, we must agree on what we are allowed to use.
 
  • Like
Likes e_jane
  • #3
use power series
 
  • #4
Let us use that ##e^{\ln(x)}=x## or prove it with your power series. With that, we only have to show that ##x\cdot \ln a = \ln a^x## and the second equation follows. We can also assume that ##x>0## since the negative case ...
\begin{align*}
\ln a^{-x}&=\ln \dfrac{1}{a^x}=\ln \left(\dfrac{1}{a}\right)^x =x\ln \left(\dfrac{1}{a}\right)\\
&=x\cdot \left(\ln 1 -\ln a\right)=x\cdot(0-\ln a)=-x\ln a
\end{align*}
... follows from the positive case and ##x=0## is trivial. I would suggest that you use
$$\ln a^x=\lim _{h\to 0}\int _{1}^{a^x}{\frac {1}{t^{1-h}}}\,\mathrm {d} t$$
as definition and substitute ##s=t^{1/x}.##
 
  • #5
How did you arrive to the conclusion that ln(1/a)^x = xln(1/a) ? This is exactly what I want to prove.
 
  • #6
I did not arrive there. I proposed possible paths. You could prove it for rationals and use continuity and the fact that ##\mathbb{Q}\subseteq \mathbb{R}## is dense, or you can use the integral definition and the substitution I suggested.

However, you should do some of the steps on your own.
 
  • Like
Likes e_jane and PeroK
  • #7
By definition:
$$b^n = \underbrace{b \times b\ ... \times b}_{n \text{ times}}$$
Therefore we get our first identity:
$$b^{n+m} = \underbrace{b \times b\ ... \times b}_{n \text{ times}}\times\underbrace{b \times b\ ... \times b}_{m \text{ times}}$$
$$b^{n+m} = b^n b^m$$
Similarly, we can get our second identity:
$$\left({b^n}\right)^m = \underbrace{\underbrace{b \times b\ ... \times b}_{n \text{ times}}\times\underbrace{b \times b\ ... \times b}_{n \text{ times}}\ ... \times \underbrace{b \times b\ ... \times b}_{n \text{ times}}}_{m \text{ times}}$$
$$\left({b^n}\right)^m = b^{nm}$$
About how this applies to rational and irrational numbers you can read the Wikipedia page about exponentiation starting here.

If you accept that and we define that ##y = \log_b x## if ##b^y = x##, then by our first identity:
$$b^{y_1}b^{y_2} = b^{y_1 + y_2}$$
$$x_1x_2 = b^{y_1 + y_2}$$
$$\log_b(x_1x_2) = y_1+y_2$$
$$\log_b(x_1x_2) = \log_b x_1+\log_b x_2$$
From there, if ##x_1 = x_2 = a##, then:
$$\log_b(a^2) = \log_b a+\log_b a = 2 \log_b a$$
And for ##\log_b(a^3)##, we get:
$$\log_b(a^2\times a) = 2\log_b a+\log_b a = 3 \log_b a$$
Or for the general case:
$$\log_b(a^x) = x \log_b a$$
As for the other case, we used the second identity:
$$a^x = \left(a\right)^x$$
$$a^x = \left(e^{ln(a)}\right)^x$$
$$a^x = e^{xln(a)}$$
 

1. How do you prove that ln(a^x) = xln(a) without using exponent rules?

To prove that ln(a^x) = xln(a) without using exponent rules, we can use the definition of logarithms and the properties of natural logarithms. First, we can rewrite ln(a^x) as ln(e^(xln(a))). Then, using the property ln(e^x) = x, we can simplify to xln(a), which is equal to the right side of the equation.

2. How do you prove that a^x = e^xln(a) without using exponent rules?

To prove that a^x = e^xln(a) without using exponent rules, we can use the definition of logarithms and the properties of natural logarithms. First, we can rewrite a^x as e^(ln(a^x)). Then, using the power property of logarithms, we can simplify to e^(xln(a)), which is equal to the right side of the equation.

3. Can you explain the relationship between ln(a^x) and xln(a)?

The relationship between ln(a^x) and xln(a) is that they are equivalent expressions. This means that they represent the same value and can be interchanged in any mathematical equation or calculation.

4. Why is it important to prove ln(a^x) = xln(a) without using exponent rules?

Proving ln(a^x) = xln(a) without using exponent rules is important because it allows us to understand the fundamental principles of logarithms and their properties. It also helps us to develop a deeper understanding of the relationships between logarithms and exponential functions.

5. Are there any other ways to prove ln(a^x) = xln(a) and a^x = e^xln(a) without using exponent rules?

Yes, there are other ways to prove ln(a^x) = xln(a) and a^x = e^xln(a) without using exponent rules. One way is to use the Taylor series expansion of ln(x) and e^x, which can be derived from the definition of the natural logarithm and the exponential function. Another way is to use the definition of the derivative of ln(x) and e^x, which can be used to show that their derivatives are equal to each other.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
945
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
909
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
262
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top