How Do You Prove These Trigonometric Identities?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving two trigonometric identities. The first identity, (1 - tan²x) / (1 + tan²x) = cos2x, is proven by manipulating the left-hand side using trigonometric identities, ultimately confirming it equals the right-hand side. The second identity, sinx + sinx cot²x = secx, raises a question about a potential missing variable, suggesting clarification is needed for accurate proof. Participants are engaged in detailed calculations and discussions to validate these identities. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding trigonometric relationships in proofs.
Cutie123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can someone please help me with these two questions.

Th first one is prove:

1-tan^2x
________ = cos2x
1+tan^2x

& the second one is

prove:

sinx+ sinxcot^2 = secx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cutie123 said:
Can someone please help me with these two questions.

Th first one is prove:

1-tan^2x
________ = cos2x
1+tan^2x

& the second one is

prove:

sinx+ sinxcot^2 = secx
1)

1-tan^2x
________ = cos2x
1+tan^2xLHS : [1 - (sin^2x/ cos^2x) ] / [ 1 + (sin^2x/cos^2x)]

= [(cos^2x -sin^2x)/cos^2x] X [cos^2x/(cos^2x + sin^2x)]

= (cos^2x - sin^2x) / (cos^2x +sin^2x ) (Rmb cos^2x + sin^2x =1 )

= cos^2x -sin^2x

= cos^2x - (1 - cos^2x)
= 2cos^2x -1 (double angle formula)
= cos2x = RHS
for question 2, did you miss out an x beside cot^ ?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top