How Do You Solve a Second Order Linear Differential Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the second-order linear differential equation given by -(ck^2)U(k,t)=d^2/dt U(k,t). The equation can be rearranged to d^2 U/dt^2 + (ck^2)U(k,t)=0, which resembles the equation for simple harmonic motion (SHM). A proposed solution format is U(k,t) = Acos(ckt)+Bcos(ckt), but it is clarified that the constants A and B should actually be arbitrary functions of k. Additionally, the correct form involves using (√c)k instead of ck in the sine and cosine terms. The general solution incorporates these corrections and emphasizes the dependence of integration constants on k.
captainjack2000
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have the equation -(ck^2)U(k,t)=d^2/dt U(k,t). And I need to find the general solution.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I can rearrange this into the form d^2 U/dt^2 + (ck^2)U(k,t)=0 but I am not sure of the form of the solution to this equation.

could someone please give me pointer in the right direction
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it just U(k,t) = Acos(ckt)+Bcos(ckt)?
 
Yeah, it's just the differential equation for SHM so that is the solution.
 
No it's not. You will get a constant when you do the integration with respect to t, and this constant can depend on k. So the general solution is what you wrote + f(k), where f(k) is an arbitrary function of k.

EDIT: You should have (√c)k instead of ck in the sin and cos.
 
Oops! I'm extremely sorry, my previous post is wrong. The constants A and B are the constants of integration, and they should be arbitrary functions of k.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top