How Do You Solve an Oscillation Problem Involving a Vertical Spring and Block?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kittykatxox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillation
AI Thread Summary
An 850 g block attached to a vertical spring with a stiffness constant of 9 N/m is analyzed for its oscillation behavior after being released from the unextended position. The angular frequency (ω) is calculated to be approximately 3.26 rad/s, which is confirmed to be correct despite a minor rounding error. The maximum extension of the spring is found to be 0.93 m, but the method used for this calculation is critiqued as insufficient for the problem's dynamics. Instead, it is suggested to apply conservation of energy principles to accurately determine the oscillation's peak-to-peak distance. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding simple harmonic motion and calculating the period of oscillation to further analyze the block's movement.
kittykatxox
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
a 850 g block is attached to a vertical spring whose stiffness constant is 9N/mThe block is released at the position where the spring is unextended. a) What is the maximum extension of the spring? b) How long does it take the block to reach the lowest point?

so I found w by using k=mw^2
9=0.85w^2
w=3.26 rad/s
next I found the max extension by using F=-(mw^2)x
(0.85*9.8)= -(0.85*(3.26)^2)x
x=0.93
I'm not sure what to do next, any help is appreciated

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kittykatxox said:
so I found w by using k=mw^2
9=0.85w^2
w=3.26 rad/s
Your ω looks pretty good. (Except for a minor rounding error. You might wish to check your significant figures.)
next I found the max extension by using F=-(mw^2)x
(0.85*9.8)= -(0.85*(3.26)^2)x
x=0.93
Sorry, :frown: but F = -kx, alone, isn't going to work for this problem all by itself. (Although you still might find it useful, so keep it in your back pocket.)

F = -kx would work if you were trying to find the distance between the old equilibrium position, before the mass was attached, to the new equilibrium position after the mass is attached.

But in this problem, the mass doesn't simply fall to the new equilibrium position and stay there. Instead it falls past the new equilibrium position and keeps going. Eventually, its velocity drops to zero for an instant, but it doesn't stop there! The spring then pulls the mass back up, again past the new equilibrium position, and eventually the mass stops back up at the top where it was initially released. The whole process then repeats. The block has gone into simple harmonic motion.

There are two ways to determine the distance from the highest position to the lowest position the mass reaches.
a. The first way is this: you could describe the geometry of this motion, and then deduce the peak-to-peak difference from that.
b. The second way is to use conservation of energy. Consider the two places in the oscillation where the velocity is zero (once at the top and once at the bottom). At both of these places, the kinetic energy of the mass is zero. Use conservation of energy, considering the gravitational potential energy, and the potential energy stored in the spring.
I'm not sure what to do next, any help is appreciated
Thanks
Again, you'll have to redo your calculation of x, as I've discussed above. But you do have a good value for ω already! (Except for the minor rounding error.)

If you know ω, can you calculate the period, T of oscillation? If the mass starts at the top, what fraction of T does it take to get to the bottom? :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top