How Do You Solve Capacitor Problems Using Kirchhoff's Laws?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving capacitor problems using Kirchhoff's Laws in a physics context. The original poster expresses confusion about parts b and c of their worksheet, particularly regarding voltage assumptions across a capacitor. Respondents clarify that Kirchhoff's Laws state that the total voltage gained in a circuit must equal the total voltage dropped, emphasizing the relationship between capacitance and voltage. They suggest using the equivalent capacitance of capacitors in parallel to determine voltage drops. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately solving the problem.
AG1189
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Ok here a scanned photo oh my worksheet for physics. I tried and used what I knew for equations to solve. After looking at other sample problems, I am not sure how to find part b and c of the problem. I think I went wrong somewhere. Could someone take a look and guide me in the right direction. ty :smile:

http://img166.imageshack.us/my.php?image=file0001ka0.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part a looks okay.
Part b, you assumed that there is 24 v across the cap of interest, is this correct? Think about kirchhoffs laws.
 
I have no idea what kirchhoffs laws means, could someone explain it in simple terms
 
Sorry, usually you see k's laws by this point. Basically( in nontechnical terms) , any voltage gained in the circuit must be dropped elsewhere. So you have an emf, or battery if you like, that is rated at 24 volts. This voltage is dropped across the capacitors. How much is dropped is given by the definition of capitance-> c = q/(delta v). Using the equivalent capacitance of each set of caps in parallel will tell you how much voltage is dropped by each pair. Devices in parallel by definition have the same voltage across them.
Really, you should look up kirchhoff's laws, there is too much to explain here.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top