How Do You Solve for Variables in Vector Addition Equations?

AI Thread Summary
To solve for the variables a and b in the vector addition equation aA + bB + C = 0, the components of the vectors must be set to zero. This results in two simultaneous equations derived from the i and j components: 6a - 8b + 26 = 0 and -8a + 3b + 19 = 0. The discussion highlights the need for both equations to find unique values for a and b, as there are infinitely many solutions without them. The user initially guessed a = 5 and b = 7, but sought an algebraic method to derive these values. Ultimately, the equations can be solved using standard algebraic techniques to find the correct magnitudes of a and b.
DoktorD
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given:
\vec{A}=(6.0\hat{i} - 8.0\hat{j})
\vec{B}=(-8.0\hat{i} + 3.0\hat{j})
\vec{C}=(26.0\hat{i} + 19.0\hat{j})

If aA+bB+C=0, what are the magnitudes of a and b?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



a(6.0\hat{i} - 8.0\hat{j}) + b(-8.0\hat{i} + 3.0\hat{j}) + (26.0\hat{i} + 19.0\hat{j}) = 0

I know that's the set up of the equation, but I have no idea how to solve for a and b. Shouldn't there be a second equation to give the relationship between a and b or else there's an infnite number of solutions? Just by looking at it for a few periods, I saw that a = 5 and b = 7 works, but I can't figure out how to reach that answer using algebra!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you will get two equations. To get the zero vector both i and j components have to be zero.
 
OK, but the thing is what method would be used here to find those two variables? What strategy would be used?
 
Nevermind, I got it
 
You have:

a(6\mathbf{\hat{i}}-8\mathbf{\hat{j}})+b(-8\mathbf{\hat{i}}+3\mathbf{\hat{j}})+(26\mathbf{\hat{i}}+19\mathbf{\hat{j}}) = (6a-8b+26)\mathbf{\hat{i}} + (-8a+3b+19)\mathbf{\hat{j}}=0

For that to equal zero both i and j components must equal 0, so you have 2 simultaneous equations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top