How Do You Solve Nodal Analysis Equations with Multiple Resistors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bengaltiger14
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the nodal analysis equations with multiple resistors, treat the two equations as a system of equations with two unknowns, v1 and v2. Start by expressing one variable in terms of the other using one of the equations, then substitute this expression into the second equation to isolate one variable. This will allow you to solve for v1 first, and then use that value to find v2. The specific values for the resistors can be substituted into the equations to simplify calculations. Following this method will lead to the correct solutions for v1 and v2.
bengaltiger14
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Need help with Simulatneous Equation...

Homework Statement



I have a circuit involving nodal analysis. I have the correct nodal equation just need help solving it.

v1(1/r1 + 1/r2 + 1/r3) - 10v(1/r1) - v2(1/r3) = 0

v2(1/r3 + 1/r4) - v1(1/r3) = 2A

V2 and V1 are my two unknowns. I don't want the answer just a start would be helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey,

Two equations, two unkowns.
Treat the equations as a system of two equations with two variables.
That should remind you about how you learned to solve systems of equations in algebra, recall that procedure and apply.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Use one of the equations to express v2 in terms of v1 (or vice-versa). Now replace the v2 in the other equation with this expression. This will yield an equation for v1 alone. Solve for v1, and finally solve for v2 using the equation for v2 in terms of v1.
 
if r1=10, r2=50,r3=20,r4=100

Should I get v2:(2A+v1(.05))/.06 for equation 2?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top