How Do You Solve Tension and Acceleration in a Two-Pulley System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter astronomerc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys Two masses
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for tension and acceleration in a two-pulley system involving two blocks. The user correctly identifies that the tension is consistent throughout the rope and sets up equations based on free body diagrams for each mass. A key point raised is the assumption of friction, which is not mentioned in the problem statement, leading to confusion in calculations. The user successfully derives an expression for acceleration but struggles with the variable for friction, denoted as 'u.' The consensus emphasizes that unless specified, all surfaces should be assumed frictionless to simplify the problem.
astronomerc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two blocks are connected by a rope that passes around two pulleys as indicated in the figure. (Attached)

a. Determine the tension in the rope.
b. Determine the acceleration of each block (Hint: The two blocks do not have the same acceleration).

The Attempt at a Solution



I call m1 the left mass and m2 the right.
I think the Tension is the same for the whole rope.
My m1 free body has normal up (+y) weight down, kinetic friction left, Tension right (+x)
My m2 free body is 2T up (-y) and weight down.
I think a1=2a2

For m1x Fx=max
T-f=m1a
T=2ma2+um1g

For m2:
m2g-2T=m2a2
T=(m2g-m2a2)/2

I put my two equations together to eliminate T
4m1a2+2um1g=m2g-m2a2

I solved for a2
a2=(m2g-2um1g)/(4m1+m2)

I plugged what I had for a2 into the original to solve for u:

I ended up with m2g-2um1g-m2g=2um1g
everything cancels to -u=u

Can someone please point out my flaw, be it in my algebra or my logic?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
astronomerc said:
I solved for a2
a2=(m2g-2um1g)/(4m1+m2)
Everything up to here looks fine.

I plugged what I had for a2 into the original to solve for u:

I ended up with m2g-2um1g-m2g=2um1g
But I don't understand what you are trying to do here. I presume u is given, just like the two masses.

You found a2, now find a1 and T.
 
u is not given. The problem in it's entirety is posted... I am struggling to find u, but think I can do the rest from there.

I thought about assuming u was zero, but that doesn't seem right either.
 
astronomerc said:
u is not given. The problem in it's entirety is posted... I am struggling to find u, but think I can do the rest from there.

I thought about assuming u was zero, but that doesn't seem right either.
It sounds like you are just assuming that there's friction. I see no mention of it in the problem statement that you gave.

In general, unless the problem explicitly mentions friction, assume that all surfaces are frictionless. (If not, there's not enough information to solve the problem.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top