How Do You Solve Tricky Integrals in AP Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter smodak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
smodak
Messages
457
Reaction score
249
Evaluate
upload_2017-11-22_16-26-33.png


What I tried so far is to break the denominator as (1+Cos2x). The integral of 1/(x^2+2) can be done with substituting x = sqrt(2)u and will evaluate to a constant times arctan (x/sqrt(2)) but I have no idea how to evaluate the rest. This is calculus AP (with real numbers only). My daughter asked me about this problem and I am stuck :). Any help is much appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-22_16-26-33.png
    upload_2017-11-22_16-26-33.png
    635 bytes · Views: 764
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks quite difficult. A numerical integration (estimate) with increments ## \Delta x =.001 ## or smaller would be straightforward, but I don't see how to get an exact answer.
 
  • Like
Likes smodak
Charles Link said:
It looks quite difficult. A numerical integration (estimate) with increments ## \Delta x =.001 ## or smaller would be straightforward, but I don't see how to get an exact answer.

It involves non-elementary functions. Maple evaluates the indefinite integral as
1/2*arctan(x)+1/4*Si(2*x-2*I)*sinh(2)+1/4*I*Ci(2*x-2*I)*cosh(2)+1/4*Si(2*x+2*I)*sinh(2)-1/4*I*cosh(2)*Ci(2*x+2*I),
where Si and Ci are the so-called "sine" and "cosine" integrals, defined as
$$\text{Si}(x) = \int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{t} \, dt,$$
and
$$\text{Ci}(x) = \gamma + \ln (x) + \int_0^x \frac{\cos(t) -1}{t} \, dt, $$
where ##\gamma## is Euler's constant.
 
  • Like
Likes smodak and Charles Link
smodak said:
Evaluate View attachment 215463

What I tried so far is to break the denominator as (1+Cos2x). The integral of 1/(x^2+2) can be done with substituting x = sqrt(2)u and will evaluate to a constant times arctan (x/sqrt(2)) but I have no idea how to evaluate the rest. This is calculus AP (with real numbers only). My daughter asked me about this problem and I am stuck :). Any help is much appreciated.

Can you give the name of the section were this problem is given? I am thinking it has to do with series.
 
  • Like
Likes smodak
MidgetDwarf said:
Can you give the name of the section were this problem is given? I am thinking it has to do with series.
This is given in the section of the 2nd fundamental theorem of calculus. I actually wrote to the person who created this problem. She just wrote to me that this she meant for it to be solved with a calculator (TI-84).
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top