How Do You Solve Wave Functions Using Determinants?

gazepdapi1
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] wave functions

I realize that I have to provide what I have done first for every problem, but this one has stumped be. It is a bonus problem provided by my teacher and it is beyond our scope. that's why its a bonus. Just helping me start it would be a big help. thank you

http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/2531/46008754yl9.jpg

thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by writing out \hat L_{z,\mathrm{total}} and \hat S_{z,\mathrm{total}}.
 
here is what I have so far

Sz(total) = Sz1 + Sz2
Sz(alpha) = +(1/2)hbar(alpha)
Sz(beta) = -(1/2)hbar(beta)

Lz(total) = Lz1 + Lz2
Lz(alpha) = + hbar(alpha)
Lz(beta) = - hbar(beta)

Is this correct?
If so, then what?
 
In the case of spin, use the fact the spin functions only act on states alpha and beta. I.e. write out the determinant, which for a 2x2 matrix is ad-bc, act on \psi (1,2) with \hat{S}_{z,total} and then see if you get back an eigenvalue equation.
Also remember that S_{z,1}, S_{z,2} only acts on states 1 and 2 respectively.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top