How Do You Transform Eigenvalues into Eigenfunctions in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattmatt321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenfunctions
mattmatt321
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm doing quantum mechanics with only a little experience in linear algebra. I've been working on eigenstates/values/functions/whatever for a couple days but still having a little trouble. Here's a question I had recently, and if anyone can do a quick check of my work and point me in the right direction, I'd appreciate it.

Homework Statement



The Hamiltonian operator for a system in 2-d vector space is iΔ(|w1><w2| - |w2><w1|). |w1> and |w2> are eigenstates of an observable operator Ω(hat).

Homework Equations



The problem asks me to do a bunch of things:
1) Represent H(hat) and Ω(hat) in a matrix in the basis |w1>,|w2>.
2) Find the eigenvalues E1 and E2 and the normalized eigenstates |E1> and |E2>.
3) Express |w1> and |w2> as linear combinations of |E1> and |E2>.
4) Finally, use this linear combination to express H(hat) and Ω(hat) in the basis |E1>,|E2>.

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, first I represented H(hat) as a matrix that looked like 0, iΔ (row 1) and -iΔ, 0 (row 2). I wasn't 100% sure how to do Ω(hat), but I figured the only non-zero values will be on the main diagonal, since we're representing it in the basis of its eigenstates.

Then, I solved for the eigenvalues and got E1 = -Δsqrt(2) and E2 = Δsqrt(2). This is the first area I got stuck -- I sort of "guessed" on how to get the eigenfunction from the eigenvalues. I think it involves solving a system of equations, but again, I'm pretty inexperienced with linear algebra.

In terms of making these eigenstates linear combinations of each other, I'm sure that means transform |w1> and |w2> into an additive combination of the new normalized eigenfunctions |E1>, |E2>. As long as I have |E1> and |E2> this seems straightforward enough.

So, I suppose if anyone can provide a straightforward method to transforming an eigenvalue into an eigenfunction and normalize it, it would be a huge help. Thanks for reading, and for all the help in the past.

EDIT: I guess this wasn't really a "quick" question in the end, sorry. But I feel like most of the helpers on PF can probably shed some light on this in about a sentence or two.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let A be a matrix and x an eigenvector of A. Then you know that Axx. Rearranging a bit, you get (A-λI)x=0, where I is the identity matrix. This is the system you want to solve to find x.

For example, say you have the matrix

A=\begin{pmatrix}1 &amp; 2 \\ 2 &amp; 1\end{pmatrix}

which have eigenvalues λ1=-1 and λ2=3. The first eigenvector satisfies

(A-\lambda I)\vec{x} = \begin{pmatrix}1-(-1) &amp; 2 \\ 2 &amp; 1-(-1)\end{pmatrix}\vec{x} = \begin{pmatrix}2 &amp; 2 \\ 2 &amp; 2\end{pmatrix}\vec{x} = 0

This yields one independent equation 2x+2y=0. So just arbitrarily set one of the variables to 1 and solve for the other. In this case, you get x=1 and y=-1. You can verify this indeed is an eigenvector by multiplying it into the original matrix:

\begin{pmatrix}1 &amp; 2 \\ 2 &amp; 1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ -1\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} -1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} = (-1)\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ -1\end{pmatrix}

and verifying the result is the vector multiplied by the eigenvalue.

To normalize the vector, just divide it by its length:

\|\vec{x}\| = \sqrt{(1)^2+(-1)^2} = \sqrt{2}

So

\hat{x} = \frac{\vec{x}}{\|\vec{x}\|} = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix}.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top