How Does a Man Walking on a Merry-Go-Round Affect Its Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asafbuch
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of a man walking on the edge of a merry-go-round, focusing on angular momentum and the effects of friction. The man moves with a constant velocity, raising questions about the angular velocity of the merry-go-round and the angle it rotates when the man completes a cycle. Participants explore the implications of conservation of angular momentum, noting that if no external torque is present, angular momentum remains conserved. The conversation highlights the distinction between external and internal torques, clarifying that friction between the man and the merry-go-round does not affect the overall angular momentum. Theoretical understanding of these principles is essential for solving the posed problems.
asafbuch
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. A man with mass m walks with a constant velocity v with respect to the ground on the edge of a marry-go-round that has a radius of R and moment of inertia I. The system starts from rest.
a) what is the angular velocity of the marry-go-round?
b) when the man completes a full cycle (returns to its initial position) at what angle did the marry-go-round rotate?
c)what is the friction coefficient between the man and the marry-go-round for the man not to get off the marry-go-round?




2. No relevant equations.



3. I tried to use conservation of angular momentum and got this:
I\omega+mR2v/R=0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi asafbuch! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and btw it's "merry-go-round" :wink:)
asafbuch said:
3. I tried to use conservation of angular momentum and got this:

that's right!

so ω = … ? :smile:
 
I thought so... but shouldn't there be any torque?

If there is a conservation of angular momentum than there is no torque acting on the marry-go-round, means there is no friction between the man and the marry-go-round...
but if there is a torque (and thus a friction) than you don't have a constant angular velocity...

whats wrong with the theory?
 
hi asafbuch! :wink:

there will be conservation of angular momentum about any point if there is no external torque about that point …

the external friction is at the centre (and so has zero torque about the centre), so angular momentum will be conserved about the centre :smile:

(the friction between the man and the merry-go-round is an internal torque, so it doesn't matter :wink:)
 
oh, thank you tiny-tim!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top