How Does a Particle Inside a Rolling Cylinder Affect Its Motion?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
Azael
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
As in the attached picture.
A cylindrical shell with mass M can roll without gliding on a horizontal plane

In the cylindrical shell a particle ,p, with mass m can glide without friction.

At the beginning there is no motion and the angle to the particles position is [tex]\phi=\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]


I am suposed to find the movement of the center of the circle as a function of the angle [tex]\phi[/tex]

Im not sure how I should start.

The potential energy of the system is, if I place the plane of reference on the level of the horizontal plane.

[tex]V=mgR(1-cos\phi)[/tex]

Now this problem obviously only has one degree of freedom and that is the angle [tex]\phi[/tex]

But if I want to construct a lagrangian I must use two degres of freedom. The rotation angle of the cylinder [tex]\alpha[/tex] and the angle to the particle p [tex]\phi[/tex]. Because I don't know how [tex]\alpha[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex] are connected. Is this the correct thinking?

In that manner I get this equation

[tex]L=T-V=\frac{3}{4}MR^2\dot{\alpha}^2+\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{\alpha}^2 R^2 + R^2\dot{\phi}^2 + \dot{\alpha}^2 R^2 sin\phi ] - mgR(1-cos\phi )[/tex]

Should I use this and solve the two lagrande equations

[tex]\frac {d}{dt} \frac{dL}{d\dot{\alpha}}-\frac{dL}{d\alpha}=0[/tex]

[tex]\frac {d}{dt} \frac{dL}{d\dot{\phi}}-\frac{dL}{d\phi}=0[/tex]

Im not sure if this will give me any answere though? It feels like I should express [tex]\alpha[/tex] in [tex]\phi[/tex] before I even do the lagrangian. Am I on the right track?
 

Attachments

  • boll.JPG
    boll.JPG
    3.8 KB · Views: 533
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume that I in the same manner can get the hamiltonian since its a conservative force situation and holonomic constrains.

[tex]H=T+V=\frac{3}{4}MR^2\dot{\alpha}^2+\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{\alpha}^2 R^2 + R^2\dot{\phi}^2 + \dot{\alpha}^2 R^2 sin\phi ] + mgR(1-cos\phi )[/tex]

But I am not quite sure what I would do with that one either. I know that

[tex]\dot{\alpha}=\frac{dH}{dP_{\alpha}}[/tex]
and
[tex]-\dot{P_{\alpha}}=\frac{dH}{d\alpha}[/tex]

But that doesn't seem to be much help either??
 
Last edited:
I don't know...I wish I could help...

It seems like you really do need two generalized coordinates. I mean, the particle is free to move; it doesn't seem like it is constrained in any way such that [tex]\phi[/tex] and [tex]\alpha[/tex] would be related.
 
I think that there is an error in your Lagrangian: Since you are interested in the movement of the cylinder and watch it in the "labatory system", so to say, you can't say that the velocity of the particle in y-direction is [itex]R \dot \phi \cos(\phi)[/itex]. [itex]\phi[/itex] is fixed in the "cylinder system", so you have you add the y-velocity of the cylinder. If you square this, you should get a "mixed term" so that the both velocities are related.
 
Last edited:
I managed to solve it. my expression for the Y position of the particle was

[tex]Rsin\phi + R\alpha[/tex]

So velocity was

[tex]R\dot{\phi}cos\phi + R\dot{\alpha}[/tex]

I used the fact that the conjugated momentum is constant for the alpha coordinate since there is no alpha, just alpha dot, dependence :) tricky problem.