How Does a Rowboat's Angle Affect Its Path Across a River with a Current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter berrywild120
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    River
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of a rowboat's angle and the river's current on its path across a river. The rowboat travels at 3.30 mi/h at an angle of 62.5 degrees north of west, while the river has an eastward current of 1.25 mi/h. Calculations indicate that the boat travels upstream approximately 560 feet when it reaches the opposite shore. Participants express confusion over the vector components, particularly regarding the interaction between the boat's velocity and the current. There is skepticism about the calculated speed exceeding the current's speed, highlighting the complexities of vector addition in this scenario.
berrywild120
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A rowboat crosses a river with a velocity of 3.30 mi/h at an angle of 62.5 degrees north of west relative to the water. The river is 0.505 mi wide and carries an eastward current of 1.25 mi/h. How far upstream is the boat when it reaches the opposite shore?

Drew a staight line down in quadrant two and made a right triangle. Then: tan(62.5°) multiplied by 1.25 mi/h = 2.40 mi/h.
Then figure the time out by distance of 0.505 mi divided by 2.40 mi/h = .210 h.
Then figure upstream at the opposite shore by: (0.505 mi) x (.210 h) = .106 mi = 560.0 feet.

I'm confused because I have a vector pointing east and one pointing north at 62.5° north of west and I feel like I'm ignoring the east pointing vector and that I need to do something else. I don't understand WHY though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Drew a staight line down in quadrant two and made a right triangle. Then: tan(62.5°) multiplied by 1.25 mi/h = 2.40 mi/h.

This is wrong. How can the current alone be causing you to travel faster than the speed of the current itself?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top