How Does a Star's Diameter Change with Rotation Period?

AI Thread Summary
A star with a mass of 1.81×10^31 kg and an initial diameter of 8.10E+9 m experiences a change in rotation period from 25.0 days to 18.0 days, prompting a size change. The calculations involve determining the new diameter while maintaining uniform density, with initial and final moments of inertia being equated. The initial poster initially misinterpreted the problem, confusing constant mass with constant density, but later corrected this by converting time units. After addressing these issues, the poster successfully calculated the new diameter. The discussion highlights the importance of unit consistency and understanding the relationship between mass, density, and rotational dynamics in stellar physics.
nnokwoodeye
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A star of mass 1.81×1031 kg and diameter 8.10E+9 m rotates with a period of 25.0 days. Suddenly the star changes size, and rotates with a new period of 18.0 days. Assuming a uniform density both before and after the size change, what is the new diameter of the star?



Homework Equations



Volume = 4/3*3.14*R^3
Density = M / VOL
I =2/5*M*R^2

The Attempt at a Solution



R(initial) = 8.10*10^9/2=4.05*0^9
Volume(initial) = 4/3*3.14*(4.05*10^9)^3=2.782*10^29
Density= (1.81*10^31/(2.782*10^29)=65.061
I(initial)=2/5*(1.81*10^31)*(4.05*10^9)^2=1.187*10^50
I(final)=2/5*65.061*4/3*3.14*Rf^3*Rf^2=109.01Rf^5
I(initial)*W(initial)=I(final)*W(final)
1.187*10^50*(2*3.14/25)=109.01*(2*3.14/18)*R(final)^5
R(final)^5=1.187*10^50*(2*3.14/25)/(109.01*[2*3.14/18])
R=(2.983*10^49/38.051)*10^(-5)=3.792*10^9
K=2R=7.58*10^9

the computer said that this answer is wrong and i don't know why
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi nnokwoodeye! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

It's very difficult to read what you've done, but I think you're misreading the question …

the mass is constant, not the density …

the question isn't saying that density is the same before as after, only that the mass is always evenly distributed.
 
I did not do the calculations but I noticed the units you used for the period were days (as given in the problem); converting to seconds might also make a difference.
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi nnokwoodeye! :smile:

the question isn't saying that density is the same before as after, only that the mass is always evenly distributed.

o.k, so how do i calculate the new density? i need it to find the radius and solve the question.



to Gear300: you are right i forgot to convert the days to seconds, but it dosn't matter because i am using days in both side of the equation so the unit conversion would have been canceled out.
 
o.k. I succeeded in solving the question
Thanks for the help
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top