How does a superconductivity cable achieve zero resistance?

AI Thread Summary
Superconductivity cables achieve zero resistance by incorporating superconducting filaments alongside conventional copper, where the superconducting path allows electricity to flow without any resistance. Although copper has its own resistance, the presence of the superconducting material means that the majority of the current will preferentially flow through the superconducting path, effectively rendering the overall resistance of the system zero. This phenomenon can be understood through the principle that current prefers the path of least resistance, which in this case is the superconducting filament. As a result, the current bypasses the copper entirely, leading to infinite conductivity in the superconducting path. This explanation highlights the unique properties of superconductors in electrical systems.
StephenP91
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Well. I have the image of the question.

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/6834/question5.png

Question b)ii).

I know that the total resistance of the cable is 0 even though the copper itself still has resistance. I just want to know how the combination of the Superconducting filaments combined with the copper itself makes the over all resistance 0.

Thank you,
Stephen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of it has the electircity taking the easiest path.
If you have two resistors in parallel and one has twice the resistance of the other, then twice as much electricty will flow down the small resistance (the easiest path) as down the high resistance path.

With a superconductor, one of the paths is perfectly 'easy' so infinitely more times as much electricty will flow down this path as the copper.
Or looking at it the other way - none of the electricty will take the copper path and the overall conductivity is still zero.
 
I think I understand now. Because I is inversely proportional to R and because the filament's R is infinitely smaller than the copper's R, the filament gets infinitely more/all of the current.

Well that's how I've made sense of it. Whether it's right or not, I don't know.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top