How Does Adding an Aluminum Rod Affect Water Temperature and Steam Production?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a calorimetry problem involving a copper calorimeter, water, and an aluminum rod, with the final temperature reaching 100 degrees and 10g of water converted to steam. Participants are calculating the energy required to vaporize the water and determining the initial temperature of the aluminum rod. The energy calculations need to account for the heat absorbed by the copper, the water, and the energy used for vaporization. There is also a question about the radiant output of an electric heater at different temperatures, with the understanding that the energy from the aluminum rod contributes to the evaporation process. Overall, the calculations involve integrating multiple energy components to solve the problem accurately.
cogs24
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
hi guys

200g copper calorimeter, 200g of water, both intially at 30 degrees. Aluminium rod added to the system, with mass of 250g, final temp is 100 degrees. 10g of water is converted to steam.

first its asking to calulate how much energy is reuiqred to vaporize those 10g to steam

then it asks the find the initial temp of the rod
For this i had:

(0.2 x 387 x 70) + (0.2 x 4186 x 70) = 0.25 x 900 x (T initial - 100)

i tried getting the initial temperature, but it didnt come out, i think i have to include the 10g vaporization of water?

Also, an electric heater has a radiant output of 500W at 150 degrees, so what's the radiant output at 200 degrees?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cogs24 said:
i think i have to include the 10g vaporization of water?
Sure, that is energy from the aluminium rod that was used to evaporate the water. The copper absorbed heat to warm up, the water absorbed heat to warm up to 100 degrees, and then additionally 10 gram absorbed energy to convert to steam. Sum the three and you get the energy the aluminium rod lost.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Back
Top