MHB How Does Air Resistance Affect Power in Rotational Motion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the power provided by air resistance to a rotating sphere system after 167 seconds. The sphere, with a mass of 1.9 kg and radius of 0.5 m, is initially rotating at 422 revolutions per minute. After introducing air resistance, which exerts a force of 0.23 N, the calculations involve determining the moment of inertia and angular acceleration. The resulting power calculated is approximately 11.47 W, but there is confusion regarding the correct application of the power formula. The user seeks clarification on their calculations and the correct approach to finding power in this context.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
A sphere of mass 1.9 kg and radius 0.5 m is attached to the end of a massless rod of length 3.0 m. The rod rotates about an axis that is at the opposite end of the sphere (see below). The system rotates horizontally about the axis at a constant 422 rev/min. After rotating at this angular speed in a vacuum, air resistance is introduced and provides a force 0.23 N on the sphere opposite to the direction of motion. What is the power (in W) provided by air resistance to the system 167.0 s after air resistance is introduced? (Enter the magnitude.)
10-8-p-102.png


Work
$$I_(new)=2/5mR^2+M(3.5)^2$$= 23.465
$$3.5F_f=I\alpha$$=.034306
$$\alpha=3.5F_f/I$$
$$\omega_0=2\pi/60*422rpm$$=44.19
$$\omega=\omega_0+\alpha*167$$=49.878
$$P=F_f*\omega$$=11.4719

What did I done wrong? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$P = \tau \cdot \omega$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top