How Does Capacitance Change with Angle in Non-Parallel Plate Capacitors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fusilli_Jerry89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Plate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance of a non-parallel plate capacitor with square plates angled at theta. For small angles, the capacitance can be approximated using the formula C = [(epsilon)(a^2)/d][1-(a(theta)/2d)]. Participants are trying to understand how to derive the capacitance for individual strips of the plates, specifically how to express it as C = (epsilon)a(deltax)/y. The conversation highlights the use of Gauss' law and the division of the capacitor into segments for analysis. Clarification is sought on the methodology for calculating capacitance for each strip in this configuration.
Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A capacitor has square plates, each of side a, making an angle theta with each other. Shown that for small theta the capacitance is given by: C = [(epsilon)(a^2)/d][1-(a(theta)/2d].


Homework Equations


C = q/V
gauss' law


The Attempt at a Solution


I see how you can divide up the strip into N segments each with length a/N. But how do u get the capacitance for each strip to be C = (epsilon)a(deltax)/y ? I know how to do the rest and I know for sure that that's the right way to do it, but how do u get the capacitance for each strip?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See that C = \epsilon*S/d, in your case for each strip S = a*dx and d = y.
 
I'm also troubled with this question, I know it has been a long time, but maybe one of you can explain me the answer?

Omer
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top