How Does Charge Distribution Affect Electric Field Calculation on a Disk?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field produced by a uniformly charged nonconducting disk, one must consider the charge distribution and its effect on the field at a point along the axis. The charge of -5.00 nC is spread over a disk with a radius of 1.15 cm, and the electric field at a distance of 3.00 cm from the center needs to be determined. The surface area element for the disk is defined as sigma = Q / A, but this formula is only applicable for infinitely large plates. A more accurate approach involves using the formula E = kq/r^2 for an infinitely thin ring and integrating over the entire disk. This method accounts for the finite size of the disk and provides a correct calculation of the electric field.
mcaro
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charge of -5.00 nC is spread uniformly over the surface of one face of a nonconducting disk of radius 1.15 cm. Find the magnitude of the electric field this disk produces at a point P on the axis of the disk a distance of 3.00 cm from its center.

Homework Equations



Surface area element for a disk [sigma]= Q / A

See attachments

The Attempt at a Solution



So I plugged the numbers in accordingly, had no luck.

I appreciate the help.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    49.5 KB · Views: 1,451
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    43.3 KB · Views: 1,495
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm working on uploading a picture of my attempt.
 
... uploaded
 

Attachments

  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 1,751
mcaro said:
Surface area element for a disk [sigma]= Q / A

That equation only applies for infinitely large plates. This disk is not infinitely large.

Try using E=kq/r^2 to get the electric field due to the charge on one infinitely thin ring surrounding the center of the disk. Then, integrate over the disk.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top