How does charge redistribute when three spheres are connected and separated?

AI Thread Summary
When three identical conductive spheres with charges of -2 µC, -6 µC, and +5 µC are connected and separated, the charge redistributes evenly among the spheres when they touch. After A and B touch, they share a total charge of -8 µC, resulting in each having -4 µC upon separation. Next, when B and C touch, they combine to have +1 µC, leading to each having +0.5 µC after separation. The discussion emphasizes that this equal distribution assumes the spheres are identical; unequal radii would alter the charge distribution to equalize potential. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing charge redistribution in conductive materials.
albert611
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a question about redistributing charges. If you have three identical spheres: A is -2 uc (microcoulombs), B is -6 uc, and C is +5 uc, touch A and B together, separate, then touch B and C together, and separate, with what charge does C end up with? I don't understand how positive and negative charges can necessarily divide their charge (as in B+C). Thank you very much!

-Albert
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the spheres are perfect conductors, all the charge will distrubute among 2 spheres will touch each other equally, since they are identical.
So if two spheres touch, you can view it essentially as single conductor. When you separate them, the total charge will be evenly distributed over the two spheres.
 
Just add: two negatives will give a "larger" negative, two positives will give a larger positive, opposite signs will cancel.
Here, A and B have a total of (-2)+ (-6)= -8 uc so after touching an separating, each will have -4 uc.

NOW B and C have a total of (-4)+ (+5)= +1 uc so after touching and separating, each will have a charge of +0.5 uc.
 
Of course, the working assumption here is that all the spheres have equal radii. The answer would change if this were not the case. When 2 spherical conductors of unequal radii are "connected", the net charge distributes itself such that the Potential is equal throughout both conductors. To attain this equal Potential, the larger sphere would require greater total (surface) charge than the smaller sphere, hence producing an unequal charge distribution between the spheres.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top