How Does Complex Epsilon Influence Wave Propagation and Attenuation?

mathman44
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
Consider a wave propagating in a medium with complex epsilon (e).

Show that the ratio of decay length to wavelength is roughly Re(e)/Im(e)
when the decay length is long compared to the wavelength.

---

I could attempt this if I knew where to start... not much help, but could anyone offer a hint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A plane electromagnetic wave of angular frequency ω propagates along the x-axis in a medium of refractive index N. Write out the wave in the exponential form.

The refractive index is N=√(ε/ε0). If ε is complex, so is N.

ehild
 
Well a plane wave for an em wave is

E=A\exp{(kr-wt)}

I'm just not seeing how to proceed from here.
 
How is related k to the wavelength? The wavelength in the medium to the refractive index? The refractive index to epsilon?

ehild
 
Last edited:
Hi. We have k=\frac{2pi}{\lambda} = \frac{2*pi*n}{\lambda_o} = \frac{2*pi*\sqrt{\epsilon}}{\lambda_o}

But of course epsilon has real and complex parts...

The ratio of the wavelength to the decay length is lambda / (1/imaginary part of k) :S
 
Do you know the imaginary part of k?

ehild
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top