How Does Current Density Vary Across a Cylindrical Region?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating current density across a cylindrical region defined by two different equations for current density, J. In the first case, J decreases linearly from a maximum at the axis to zero at the surface, while in the second case, it is maximum at the surface and decreases to zero at the axis. Participants emphasize the need to integrate the current density over the area to find the total current, as J is not constant throughout the area. The correct approach involves using polar coordinates for integration to account for the varying current density. Understanding this integration process is crucial for accurately determining the current in both scenarios.
Aviegaille
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(a)The current density across a cylindrical region of radius R varies according to the equation: J=J0(1-r/R), where r is the distance from the axis of the cylinder. The current density is the maximum J0 at the axis r=0 and decreases linearly to zero at the surface r=R. Calculate the current in terms J0 and the region's cross sectional area A=pi*R^2.

(b) Now suppose that a current density was a maximum Jo at the surface and decreased linearly to zero at the axis, so that: J=J0 r/R. Calculate the current. Why is the result different for these two cases?

Homework Equations



I=JA

The Attempt at a Solution



I uploaded a picture of the first part but I am not sure if it's correct. I also don't know how to get the area from this problem. I am thinking of plugging the value of R from I to get the area but I am pretty sure it is not right.
 

Attachments

  • 10711264_757361231009229_384913907_n.jpg
    10711264_757361231009229_384913907_n.jpg
    36.8 KB · Views: 583
Physics news on Phys.org
You're integrating w.r.t. J_0?! That's strangely wrong!
As you wrote, I=JA but that's only when J is a constant through out A. Otherwise you have I=\int dI=\int J dA. Here J is not constant and so you should integrate w.r.t. area. But what that area is, depends on the direction of J(remember current density is a vector!). You didn't give what's the direction of J but from the area formula you given, I take it that \vec J=J \hat z. So the integral you should do is I=\int _0^R \int_0^{2\pi} J r d\varphi dr.
 
Shyan said:
You're integrating w.r.t. J_0?! That's strangely wrong!
As you wrote, I=JA but that's only when J is a constant through out A. Otherwise you have I=\int dI=\int J dA. Here J is not constant and so you should integrate w.r.t. area. But what that area is, depends on the direction of J(remember current density is a vector!). You didn't give what's the direction of J but from the area formula you given, I take it that \vec J=J \hat z. So the integral you should do is I=\int _0^R \int_0^{2\pi} J r d\varphi dr.

Thanks for correcting J_0. Can you further explain this ∫2π0Jrdφ ??
 
.
 
Aviegaille said:
Can you further explain this part \int_0^{2\pi} J r d\varphi
Since ##J## is changing throughout the area you are considering, you have to integrate it with respect to area to get the current. ##
I=\int _0^R \int_0^{2\pi} J r d\varphi dr## is just ##
\int J dA
## in polar coordinates (hopefully you've seen them before).
 
ZetaOfThree said:
Since ##J## is changing throughout the area you are considering, you have to integrate it with respect to area to get the current. ##
I=\int _0^R \int_0^{2\pi} J r d\varphi dr## is just ##
\int J dA
## in polar coordinates (hopefully you've seen them before).

I haven't but that makes sense. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top