How Does D'Alembert's Solution Explain Physical Phenomena?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcmzie
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
D'Alembert's solution refers to a method for solving the wave equation, a second-order partial differential equation that describes wave propagation. It states that the solution can be expressed as the sum of two wave functions, one moving in the positive direction and the other in the negative direction. Physically, this means that when a disturbance occurs, such as a kick to a rope, two waves propagate outward in opposite directions. The solution allows for an infinite number of specific solutions depending on the initial conditions and boundary constraints. Ultimately, it illustrates how waves can interact and transfer energy along a medium.
mcmzie
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What is d 'Alembert's solution? (in simple terms)

What does it mean physically
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have two waves moving at each other and passing by.
 
Just to clarify, do you mean the D'Alembert solution for the wave equation or the D'Alembert's method for Newtonian dynamics?

For the wave equation, I think the intuition is basically like what Cyrus said. D'Alembert's solution says that you get two disturbances which propagate outwards in space and time, but in opposite directions. Imagine taking a jump rope and having two people hold it on either side. If another person comes and kicks the jump rope in the center, you will see that the rope moves outwards towards both people, in two different directions. That's kind of the intuition I think. However, I'd like to hear more people speak about the intuition as far as the general energy/momentum transfer goes.
 
D'Alemberts solution isn't saying anything about momentum transfer. Its simply saying that two waves move past each other. Its a solution to a PDE.

It can be shown that energy is conserved starting from the wave equation, but that has nothing to do with D'Alemberts solution.
 
mcmzie said:
What is d 'Alembert's solution? (in simple terms)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_equation#Solution_of_the_initial_value_problem

it's a clean and simple solution to a partial differential equation, called the wave equation, and in one spatial dimension (along with time) the wave equation:

\frac{\partial^2 f(x,t) }{ \partial t^2 } = c^2 \frac{ \partial^2 f(x,t) }{ \partial x^2 }

is the physical description of what the displacement of a string, f(x,t), is at point x and at time t. this is a 2nd order differential equation so it will have two linearly independent solutions to it, f+(x,t) and f-(x,t) to it. the subscripts will be explained below.

the d 'Alembert's solution or " d 'Alembert's formula" is

f(x,t) = f_{+}(x,t) + f_{-}(x,t)

where

f_{+}(x,t) = f_1(x-ct)

and

f_{-}(x,t) = f_2(x+ct)

or more simply

f(x,t) = f_1(x-ct) + f_2(x+ct)

and where f1(x) and f2(x) are any two continuous functions of x. f+(x,t) or f1(x-ct) represents a wave moving in the +x direction and f-(x,t) or f2(x+ct) is a wave on the string moving in the -x direction. so pick any two f1(x) and f2(x) and you have a solution to the differential equation above. so from that, there are still an infinite number of solutions available to you and you need more information to get to a particular solution.

now, if there are boundary conditions on f(x,t), like the string is terminated (like a guitar string) so that f(0,t)=0 and f(L,t)=0 for all t, (L is the length of the string between the termination points (the bridge and nut or fret of a guitar), then some relationship between f1(x) and f2(x) is indicated:

f(0,t) = f_{+}(0,t) + f_{+}(0,t) = 0 = f_1(-ct) + f_2(ct)

or f_1(-x) = -f_2(x)

and

f(L,t) = f_{+}(L,t) + f_{+}(L,t) = 0 = f_1(L-ct) + f_2(L+ct)

or f_1(L-x) = -f_2(L+x)

That gives you some symmetry properties. If it's a guitar string, and it's a slow, careful pluck (at t=0) where the string is deflected by the pick but is at rest at t=0 when the pick is released, the string's initial shape is assumed known

f(x,0) = f_1(x) + f_2(x)

it turns out that if the string's velocity at time 0 is zero,

\frac{\partial f(x,t) }{\partial t}\Big|_{t=0} = 0

then f1(x) = f2(x) and

f(x,t) = ( f(x-ct,0) + f(x+ct,0) )/2

it's not the simple answer. but reasonably complete.

What does it mean physically

it means that the wave equation can be solved into a form of adding two wave functions together each representing waves going in opposite directions on the string and having equal wave speed.
 
Thanks for your clarification
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top