How Does Damping Frequency Influence a Harmonic Oscillator?

AI Thread Summary
Damped molecular dynamics is utilized as a minimization scheme in the referenced article, with a specific focus on estimating optimal damping frequency. The estimator provided in formula No. 9 relates to the logarithmic decrement method, which uses energy instead of amplitude to determine the damping parameter. The discussion highlights that the amplitude and energy decay more rapidly as the damping coefficient increases, with the maximum decay occurring when the damping ratio equals one. For values of the damping ratio greater than one, two solutions exist, with the smaller solution resulting in slower energy decay. Further research on damped single-degree-of-freedom oscillators is suggested for those seeking additional insights.
Derivator
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
Hi,

in this article:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00308-5
damped molecular dynamics is used as a minimization scheme.
In formula No. 9 the author gives an estimator for the optimal damping frequency:
2rm5x1g.jpg
Can someone explain how to find this estimate?

best,
derivator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can find solutions of (7) in the form $$x = Ae^{(-\sigma + i\omega)t}$$ (where ##\sigma## and ##\omega## are real-valued functions of ##\gamma##).

The amplitude, and therefore the energy, decreases faster as ##\sigma## increases. The maximum value of ##\sigma## is when ##\gamma = 1##.

Note that when ##\gamma > 1##, there are two solutions with different values of ##\sigma##, and the energy decays "slowest" for the smaller solution.

Google for the solution of a damped single-degree-of-freedom oscillator, if you don't want to do the math yourself.

(9) looks like a version of the "logarithmic decrement" method of estimating the damping parameter, but using energy rather than the amplitude, and assuming that energy is proportional to amplitude squared, hence the square root in (9). Google "log dec".
 
Last edited:
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top