How does diazomethane react with a diketone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1/2"
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The reaction of 1-phenylbuta-1,3-dione with diazomethane in the presence of ether involves the attack of the positively charged nitrogen from diazomethane on one of the carbonyl carbons. This interaction may lead to the formation of a nitrogen-containing product, with the ether potentially playing a role in stabilizing intermediates. The discussion references the Nierenstein reaction but clarifies that it does not directly apply to this scenario. Participants seek clarification on the mechanism and potential products, indicating a need for further insight into the reaction pathway. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity of the reaction and the desire for a deeper understanding of the chemistry involved.
1/2"
Messages
98
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What are the products when 1-phenylbuta-1,3-dione reacts with diazomethane in
presence of ether?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to do it this way:
Since carbonyl carbons of 1-phenylbuta-1,3-dione , one of them might get attacked by the positively charged nitrogen of diazomethane ;and the oxygen ,will therefore (maybe?), bond with the other nitrogen . And then I think the ether will do something but the problem is I can't reason out what happens next or is this approach even correct or not.:confused::cry:
Is this some named reaction ? I tried to google it and stumbled upon the Nierenstein reaction but that is not exactly this reaction , right?:confused:
Any hint or help will be REALLY appreciated.
Thanks in advance.:biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top