How Does Dipole Arrangement Affect Electric Field Strength at a Distance?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field strength at a distance from a pair of dipoles arranged back-to-back. Participants suggest using the electric potential and electric field equations, emphasizing the need to consider all four charges in the dipole arrangement. The approximation of r being much greater than a (r >> a) simplifies the calculations. There is also a mention of potential challenges when extending these calculations to more complex arrangements like hexapoles. Overall, the conversation highlights the methods for deriving the electric field from dipole configurations.
scholio
Messages
159
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



assume that two dipoles are placed back -t0 - back along axis as shown:

((-) a (+))(( +) a (-)) ------------------x axisr is oriented between ))(( but above, a distance such that r>>a

compute the strength of the electric field on the axis of the pair at a distance r away from the the center of the dipole pair. use the approximation r>>a to simply your expression. each charge can be assumed to be 1 microcoulomb charge with the sign shown in the diagram

Homework Equations



electric potential V = kq/r where k is 9*10^9 constant, q is charge in coulombs, r is distance the charge is from the point r

electric field E = 2kP/r^3 where P is the dipole moment, given as 10^-8 C-m -->derivative of electric potential eq

The Attempt at a Solution



i am not sure where to draw the diagram as shown with lines connecting each charge (4 of them) and using the V equation to sum them up, but r is not given a numeric value

then do i do the derivative of the summation of V?

or do i just use the electric field equation, but how do i involve all four charges, and what do i put in for r in the denominator?

any help appreciated

cheers...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry for double posting, but i think i may have the wrong electric potential V equation.

should it be:

V =kpcosine(theta)/r^2 where p = 2qa, q = charge, a is distance b/w charges of dipole.

but since the problem involves two dipoles, do i multiply V by 2? how about the derivative (electric field E)?

but in order to find the electric field, i would need to take the derivative, so i should get this:

E = 2kpcosine(theta)/r^3 where r is the distance between pt r and the dipole(s)

do i multiply E by two because the problem involves two dipoles? when i put in p = 2qa with q = 1 microcoulomb and r>>a i got

E = 72000a(cosine(theta))/r^3 Newtons/coulomb

any closer?...
 
Last edited:
Hi scholio,

I would use either

<br /> E=\frac{k q}{r^2}<br />

or

<br /> V= \frac{kq}{r}<br />

and apply it to all four charges. It doesn't make much difference which one you use since everything is along the same line.

Calculate the exact value of the total field or total potential. You'll have parts like (r+a) and (r-a) in some of the denominators. Then you can use the fact that r >> a to find an approximation for those denominators. After a few cancellations you should get the answer. What do you get?
 
yes we can easily calculate it but my question is what we will do if we have to calculate electric field of a hexapole ...can anyone help me.please
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top