How Does Electric Flux Differ Across a Hemispherical Surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdf730
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Hemisphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating electric flux through a hemispherical surface in a uniform electric field. The Gaussian surface, with a radius of 6.08 cm and an electric field strength of 9.35 N/C, encloses no net charge, leading to a total flux of zero according to Gauss's Law. The flat base of the hemisphere experiences flux due to the electric field being perpendicular to it, while the curved portion's flux must be evaluated using surface element vectors. The original poster initially assumed equal flux for both sections but later recognized the need for distinct calculations. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that the total flux through the closed surface remains zero, despite the electric field penetrating the base.
mdf730
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A Gaussian surface in the form of a hemisphere of radius R = 6.08 cm lies in a uniform electric field of magnitude E = 9.35 N/C. The surface encloses no net charge. At the (flat) base of the surface, the field is perpendicular to the surface and directed into the surface. What is the flux through (a) the base and (b) the curved portion of the surface?

Homework Equations



\Phi = EA

The Attempt at a Solution



I assumed a would equal b, that is, both would be pi(.0608)^2 * 9.35, or .108 Nm^2/C.
That is indeed the correct answer for b, but a is still incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So the e field is penetrating just a circular area pi*r^2. And half the surface area of a sphere 4*pi*r^2 divided by 2?

Have I read the question correctly that the base is just the area of a circle?
 
According to Gauß's Law, the total flux must be 0. To evaluate this explicitly for the given closed (!) surface, you have to use vectors:
\Phi=\int_A \mathrm{d} \vec{A} \cdot \vec{E}.
Here, \mathrm{d} \vec{A} is the surface-element vector, whose length is the area of that surface element and which points perpendicularly out of the volume enclosed by the surface (by convention).

To calculate it, parametrize the surface (for the spherical part, use spherical coordinates) and evaluate the corresponding usual double integral.
 
You don't need to evaluate any integrals.

Hint: the total flux leaving the closed hemisphere is what? What is the total flux entering from the bottom? Then, what is the total flux leaving the curved surface?
 
The Op indicates the answer says there is net flux. Yet it also says a Gaussian surface that does not enclose charge. So maybe the question involves two surfaces that are not closed and have e field penetrating them?
 
pgardn said:
The Op indicates the answer says there is net flux. Yet it also says a Gaussian surface that does not enclose charge. So maybe the question involves two surfaces that are not closed and have e field penetrating them?

No. There is just one hemispherical closed surface with the E field perpendicular to the flat side and directed into the surface (hint, hint). There is no net charge inside, therefore no net efflux or influx.

The OP is very close to the right answer for (a) also. I can't give more of a hint without flat-out divulging the answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top