How Does Electron Charge Density Affect Electric Field in a Hydrogen Atom?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between electron charge density and the electric field in a hydrogen atom's ground state. The charge density is expressed as p(r) = -e/πa^3 exp(-2r/a), where a is the Bohr radius. The electric field E(r) is derived from this charge density, leading to a specific formula that incorporates exponential decay and radial dependence. The solution involves integrating the electric field over all space, which is justified by the spherical symmetry of the charge distribution. Applying Gauss' Law simplifies the understanding of how the electric field behaves at different distances from the nucleus.
bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The electron charge density of a hydrogen atom in its ground state is given by:

p(r) = -e/ pi a^3 exp(-2r/a) where a is the Bohr radius

Show the E field due to the cloud is given by:

E(r) = e/4pi episllon0 ( (exp(-2r/a) -1)/r^2 + 2exp(-2r/a)/ar + 2exp(-2r/a)/a^2)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the E field is given by: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb\'s_law#Continuous_charge_distribution

I\'m trying to understand a solution I\'ve been provided with... but the solution takes out a factor of 1/4pi e0 r^2 then integrates the expression over all space (r\' ^2 sintheta, dtheta dphi dr\') to get the right answer..

I don't understand why this works...surely each little element of charge is a different distance away from the point r (i.e. r-r\')?

Can anyone explain this to me?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the ground state, the charge distribution has spherical symmetry, independent on direction. It can be assumed the same for the electric field that it is function of r alone. Apply Gauss' Law.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top