How Does Fluid Velocity Change in a Draining Conical Funnel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raptor11122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid Speed
Raptor11122
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. The problem
A funnel is in the form of a cone of semi-angle alpha and is placed with its vertex downwards. It is filled with water to a depth H and then the water is allowed to flow out of the funnel through a small hole at the vertex. If the stream of water has a cross-section of area A, and the velocity of the fuid in the stream when the depth of the water in the funnel is h and the rate at which the water level is decreasing is equal to U. Show further that:

## U^2 = \frac{A}{ \pi \tan(\alpha)} (\frac{2g}{h^3})^3 ## (Equation 1)2. The attempt at a solution
## A = \pi r^2 = \pi h^2 tan(\alpha)^2 ##

as

## tan(\alpha) =\frac{r}{h}## for a cone

##uA \delta = UA , u = ##velocity of fluid coming out and ##\delta << 1##

using Bernoulli means that

## u= \sqrt{2gh} ##

from this you can show that

## u^2 = \frac{A}{ \pi \tan(\alpha)} (\frac{2g}{h^3})^3 ##

The problem is I have a ##u^2 ## instead of ##U^2## as asked for in the question. What am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In this problem, A is supposed to be the cross sectional area of the hole at the bottom of the funnel. In terms of h and tanα, what is the cross sectional area at the upper surface of the liquid in the funnel? In terms of A, what is the volumetric flow rate out the bottom of the funnel?

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes Raptor11122
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top