How Does Friction and Centripetal Force Affect a Person Inside a Rotating Rotor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 0kelvin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics Rotor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of a person inside a rotating rotor, focusing on the forces at play, including weight, friction, and centripetal force. It clarifies that the friction force is maximum when the person is about to slide down, expressed as the product of the static friction coefficient and the normal force. The minimum velocity required to prevent sliding is determined by balancing the friction force and weight, leading to the conclusion that mass cancels out in the equations. There is a noted contradiction regarding the role of weight in maintaining contact with the wall, as the calculations suggest that increased velocity could lead to sliding. Ultimately, the relationship between these forces is crucial for understanding the mechanics of rotation in this context.
0kelvin
Messages
50
Reaction score
5
The free boy diagram of one person inside the rotor should have three vectors: weight down, friction up, normal to the center of the cylinder.

Is friction force given by centripetal force * static friction coefficient? Normal and centripetal are the same vector in this problem.

Is minimum velocity for a person to not slide down given by an equality between friction force and weight? Mass cancels out in both sides.

The previous question makes me think there is a contradiction: weight of a person is not required to explain why the person "sticks" to the wall when the rotor is rotating. But I did use mass to calculate the friction force. In the second question I've noticed that the mass cancels out, but the equation gives me the impression that if v is high enough, friction would become greater than weight and therefore, person would slide up.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
0kelvin said:
The free boy diagram of one person inside the rotor should have three vectors: weight down, friction up, normal to the center of the cylinder.

Is friction force given by centripetal force * static friction coefficient? Normal and centripetal are the same vector in this problem.

Is minimum velocity for a person to not slide down given by an equality between friction force and weight? Mass cancels out in both sides.

The previous question makes me think there is a contradiction: weight of a person is not required to explain why the person "sticks" to the wall when the rotor is rotating. But I did use mass to calculate the friction force. In the second question I've noticed that the mass cancels out, but the equation gives me the impression that if v is high enough, friction would become greater than weight and therefore, person would slide up.
Can you type the questions exactly as they are given? Written as they are now, the first question is incomprehensible. Even the second one is confusing.

Note that the friction force is given by \mu_s n only when the friction force is maximum, i.e. when the person is about to slide down. In all other situations, when the person is not sliding, the friction force is simply equal to mg (and it is then NOT equal to \mu_s n)
 
What's the expression that calculates the friction force?

My take is: ##F = \mu_s \frac{mv^2}{r}## Because centripetal is the Normal.

What's the expression that calculates the minimum velocity for the the person to "stick" to the wall?

My take is: ##mg = \mu_s \frac{mv^2}{r}## Mass cancels out in both sides.
 
0kelvin said:
What's the expression that calculates the friction force?

My take is: ##F = \mu_s \frac{mv^2}{r}## Because centripetal is the Normal.

What's the expression that calculates the minimum velocity for the the person to "stick" to the wall?

My take is: ##mg = \mu_s \frac{mv^2}{r}## Mass cancels out in both sides.
You are right IF we are considering the case when the speed is minimum and the person is just on the point of sliding down. If the speed is larger then we have instead

F_s= mg and n = m v^2/R

but we do not have anymore the relation F = \mu_s n
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top