How Does Heat Addition Change the Temperature of an Ideal Gas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter keemosabi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final temperature of an ideal monatomic gas after adding heat and performing work on it. The initial conditions include three moles of gas at 345 K, with 2114 J of heat added and 811 J of work done. The relevant equation for internal energy change is highlighted as ΔU = Q - W, where Q is heat added and W is work done. It is emphasized that for an ideal gas, the specific heat at constant volume (Cv) is 3R/2, linking internal energy change to temperature change. The conclusion drawn is that the temperature change can be determined using the relationship ΔU = nCvΔT.
keemosabi
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three moles of an ideal monatomic gas are at a temperature of 345 K. Then, 2114 J of heat are added to the gas, and 811 J of work are done on it. What is the final temperature of the gas?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have a feeling I'm missing an equation. I thought the equation was U = Q - W but that won't help me here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
keemosabi said:
[

The Attempt at a Solution


I have a feeling I'm missing an equation. I thought the equation was U = Q - W but that won't help me here.
How is U related to temperature? Hint: what is the specific heat of a monatomic gas at constant volume (where W = 0 so Q = U)?

AM
 
Doesn't it depend upon the gas?
 
keemosabi said:
Doesn't it depend upon the gas?
Not if it is an ideal gas, which this is. The specific heat is Cv = 3R/2 where R is the universal gas constant (units are J/mole K). Since, by definition, \Delta Q = nC_v\Delta T and \Delta U = \Delta Q for a constant volume process and since U is a function only of T, it follows that

\Delta U = nC_v\Delta T[/itex]<br /> <br /> regardless of the type of process.<br /> <br /> AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top