How Does Inelastic Collision Facilitate Ionization and Excitation in Plasma?

VulpineNinja
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. Explain why it is important for inelastic equation to occur in a plasma in order for process such as ionization and excitation to happen.

2. 1/2(m1u1^2) = 1/2(m1)(v1^2 + u1^2 sin^2(theta)) + 1/2(m2v2^2) + (delta)U3. According to the inelastic equation above, in order for ionization and excitation to happen there should be an energy loss. And it is possible for atom to get excited or release electrons if another electron collides with the atom in inelastic equation. Which means that m1 must be smaller than m2

Sorry I don't have any software to write the equation clearly.
Anyways, I'm not sure how am I supposed to answer the question (should I explain the process based on the equation to prove my statement?), or that if my answer is accurate enough. Like, how do I relate with the loss of energy, (delta)U?
And furthermore, what makes inelastic collision (in plasma) more important than elastic?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess ionization and excitation require some energy in order to happen and that energy is the loss in the kinetic energy (delta)U.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top