How Does Integration by Parts Apply in Calculating Average Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moneer81
  • Start date Start date
Moneer81
Messages
158
Reaction score
2
Hi,

while solving for the average energy given by the following formula:

\overline {E} = \frac {\int_{0}^{\infty} E e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE}{\int_{0}^{\infty} e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE}

where E bar is average energy, k is the Boltzmann's constant, and T is temperature

I had to use integration by parts for the numerator.

Integration by parts formula is \int u dv = uv - \int v du

So I made the following choices (and so did my textbook):

u = E

then du = dE

dv = e^\frac{-E}{kT}

and so v = -kTe^\frac{-E}{kT}

Then I proceeded by applying the integration by parts formula, and the integral of the numerator would be:

\int_{0}^{\infty} E e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE = -EkTe^\frac{-E}{kT} + kT \int_{0}^{\infty} e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE

but to my surprise, the book proceeded in the following manner:

\int_{0}^{\infty} E e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE = kT \left[e^\frac{-E}{kT} \right]<br /> _{0}^{\infty} + kT \int_{0}^{\infty} e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE

That first term to the right of the equal sign threw me off...where did it come from?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First

dv=e^{-\frac{E}{kT}} \ dE

then you're right. It has to be some error in the book. Perhaps they meant

kT \left[e^{-\frac{E}{kT}}\right]_{+\infty}^{0}

,that is converting the minus before the whole term into an interchange of integration limits.

Daniel.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top