How Does Invertibility Affect the Determinant in Matrix Operations?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 5K views
RWalden21
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A and B be square matrices, with B invertible. Show that det(BAB^-1) = det(A)


Homework Equations



I think its based off the theorem: If A and B are nxn matrices, then det(AB)= det(A)det(B)

The Attempt at a Solution




I started by simplifying BAB^-1det(A) to just try to get det(A) but I'm just not sure how to do the proof.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you can expand by det(B)det(A)det(B^-1) but I don't know how det(B) relates to det(B^-1). What I was thinking was by expanding and somehow getting B and B^-1 to = I somehow det(A) would remain
 
RWalden21 said:
I suppose you can expand by det(B)det(A)det(B^-1) but I don't know how det(B) relates to det(B^-1). What I was thinking was by expanding and somehow getting B and B^-1 to = I somehow det(A) would remain

Hint: B-1B= I so if you find then the determinant of I should be the same as the determinant of B-1B right?
 
is this correct?

det(BAB^-1)= det(B)det(A)det(B^-1)= det(BB^-1)det(A)= det(I)det(A)= det(A)

det(I) = 1
 
RWalden21 said:
is this correct?

det(BAB^-1)= det(B)det(A)det(B^-1)= det(BB^-1)det(A)= det(I)det(A)= det(A)

det(I) = 1

Yep, that will work. So now you know that det(B-1) = 1/det(B), which may help you somewhere down the road.
 
RWalden21 said:

Homework Statement



Let A and B be square matrices, with B invertible. Show that det(BAB^-1) = det(A)

Homework Equations



I think its based off the theorem: If A and B are nxn matrices, then det(AB)= det(A)det(B)

The Attempt at a Solution

I started by simplifying BAB^-1det(A) to just try to get det(A) but I'm just not sure how to do the proof.

Didn't you realize you've like already done the proof? You know that if ##\mathbf A,\;\mathbf B\in\mathbb R##, then ##\det\mathbf{AB}=\det\mathbf A\det\mathbf B## and ##\det\left(\mathbf{A}^{-1}\right)=\det\left(\mathbf{A}\right)^{-1}##. So if you just simplify ##\det\left(\mathbf{BAB^{-1}}\right)##, what do you get?

Edit: Why is the ##\LaTeX## equation not rendering?
Edit2: Ok, now it renders. I just realized there is an even simpler method though. You could just break up the determinant into three parts and the join two of them and you are done.
 
Last edited:
dimension10 said:
Didn't you realize you've like already done the proof? You know that if ##\mathbf A,\;\mathbf B\in\mathbb R##
A and B aren't real numbers; they're matrices.
dimension10 said:
, then ##\det\mathbf{AB}=\det\mathbf A\det\mathbf B## and ##\det\left(\mathbf{A}^{-1}\right)=\det\left(\mathbf{A}\right)^{-1}##. So if you just simplify ##\det\left(\mathbf{BAB^{-1}}\right)##, what do you get?
 
Mark44 said:
A and B aren't real numbers; they're matrices.

Sorry, I meant ##\mathbf{A},\;\mathbf{B}\in\mathbb R^{n\times n}##