How does linear velocity of a spinning object affect its rebound

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how the linear velocity of a spinning basketball affects its rebound after striking a wall. It highlights that friction between the ball and the wall plays a crucial role in transferring rotational energy into lateral velocity. While higher initial velocities lead to greater compression of the ball, the time of contact remains consistent. The transfer of angular momentum is influenced by the torque generated during the collision, but once the ball stops slipping, further increases in velocity may not significantly alter the outcome. Ultimately, the spin can contribute to lateral velocity as long as there is sufficient rotational energy available for conversion.
WilkinzMicawber
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Consider the case where a basketball rotating about its center of mass strikes a wall head-on. The velocity given it parallel to the wall due to the spin is caused by the friction between the wall and the ball as the ball is sliding against the wall during the collision. Friction is proportional to the normal force acting on a surface. The faster the ball hits the wall, the greater is the normal force, but the time the ball touches the wall is also smaller. Does the linear velocity of the ball have any effect on the total amount of velocity given to the ball parallel to the wall?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think the time of contact is smaller. Think of the basketball as a spring. The kinetic energy of the ball 1/2 m v^2 gets converted to elastic potential energy 1/2 k x^2. So the distance the ball compresses is

x = sqrt(m/k) v0

The force from the first contact to maximum compression is -k x, so the acceleration is
a = - kx/m.

dx^2/dt^2 = -kx/m

Implies

x = C sin(sqrt(k/m) t)

Which knowing the max x from above must be

x = sqrt(m/k) v0 sin( sqrt(k/m) t)

where t=0 gives x=0 as the moment of initial contact. Maximum compression is reached when

sqrt(k/m) t = pi / 2

So tmax = sqrt(k/m) pi/2

So higher initial velocity gives greater compression but the time of contact is the same.

Regarding the effect that has on the transfer of the angular momentum for some of the time the ball slips and there is one torque then it sticks. Since the force is higher the torque is higher but once it's enough to stop the ball I suppose there isn't much difference if you go to yet higher velocity. I have no idea at what velocity the spin finally stops.
 
  • Like
Likes WilkinzMicawber
Thank you for your very in-depth reply. The main concern is whether the ball will travel further in the direction of the wall after rebounding, due to the spin. Your answer helped me realize the answer. The spin can only result in velocity along the wall as long as there is rotational energy left to convert to lateral velocity, through friction. Assuming the duration of contact is sufficient to transfer all of the rotational energy to kinetic energy in the cases where the striking linear velocity differs, the amount of spin transferred to lateral velocity should be similar.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top