How Does Newton's Third Law Apply When One Block Pushes Another?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aeromat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on Newton's Third Law, two blocks of mass m1 and m2 are analyzed under the influence of a constant force F applied to m1 on a frictionless surface. The key focus is on determining the acceleration of the system while considering the action and reaction forces between the blocks. It is clarified that the force exerted by m2 on m1 is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the force m1 exerts on m2. The problem simplifies the analysis by treating both blocks as a single unit for calculating acceleration, despite their differing masses. Understanding these forces is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
aeromat
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Problem Type: Derivation

Homework Statement


2 blocks of mass m1 and m2 are placed in contact with each other on a smooth, horizontal surface as in the figure below. A constant force F is applied to m1 as shown.

(a) find the acceleration of the system


Homework Equations


Newton's Laws


The Attempt at a Solution


Picture of the problem:

F
-------> [ m1 ][m2]
=================================

Frictionless surface assumed.


FBD Sketch (are the action and reaction forces equal in magnitude?)

For m1:

Applied force -----> [ m1 ] <----- Reaction force by M2?
Fn and Fg are present.

For m2:

Applied force by m1-----> [m2]
Fn and Fg are present.

Is the reaction force received by m1 pushing m2 equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the applied force on m1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the problem is only asking you the acceleration of the system, you can safely consider m1 and m2 the "same" block.

Remember, don't confuse yourself with free-body-diagrams. Usually only consider a force for calculation if it results in acceleration. In this case, the only force causing acceleration is the push (or friction, if it specifies).
 
But wait, the picture of my diagram states that the m1 mass is much bigger than the m2 mass. So, how would this work out? I am getting really confused with the action/reaction forces, and I don't know how I would work without them.
 
The force exerted by m2 on m1 is equal (in magnitude) but opposite (in direction) to the force m1 exerts on m2.

I would call this the reaction force.

I would call this the action force.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top