How Does Optical Absorption Threshold Measure the Band Gap in Semiconductors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absorption
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] direct absorption proces

Homework Statement



My solid-state physics book (Kittel) says the following in the chapter about semiconductors:

"In a direct absorption process the threshold of continuous optical absorption at frequency \omega_g measure the band gap E_g = \hbar \omega_g",

Apparently this is a definition, so it is hard to argue with it, but can someone explain what the "threshold of continuous optical absorption" means and how that could measure the band gap?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
ehrenfest said:

Homework Statement



My solid-state physics book (Kittel) says the following in the chapter about semiconductors:

"In a direct absorption process the threshold of continuous optical absorption at frequency \omega_g measure the band gap E_g = \hbar \omega_g",

Apparently this is a definition, so it is hard to argue with it, but can someone explain what the "threshold of continuous optical absorption" means and how that could measure the band gap?

by "threshold" of absorption he means the lowest (incoming beam) energy at which you measure absorption. below this energy there will be no absorption and the incoming beam will simply pass through the material as if it were completely transpartent.

I.e., the absorption spectrum should look something like a theta function
<br /> \theta(\hbar \omega - E_g)<br />
times some other smooth function

in real life the absorption spectrum is not a perfect step function, but it does "turn on" fairly sharply at "threshold" (sharply enough so that we can tell what the threshold incoming energy is).

The reason he uses the word "continuous" is that there actually can be some absorption "below threshold" due to bound states, but that absorption shows up in the spectrum as discrete little peaks (like delta function, but not infinity sharp), not as a continuous spectrum.
 
olgranpappy said:
by "threshold" of absorption he means the lowest (incoming beam) energy at which you measure absorption. below this energy there will be no absorption and the incoming beam will simply pass through the material as if it were completely transpartent.

I.e., the absorption spectrum should look something like a theta function
<br /> \theta(\hbar \omega - E_g)<br />
times some other smooth function

in real life the absorption spectrum is not a perfect step function, but it does "turn on" fairly sharply at "threshold" (sharply enough so that we can tell what the threshold incoming energy is).

The reason he uses the word "continuous" is that there actually can be some absorption "below threshold" due to bound states, but that absorption shows up in the spectrum as discrete little peaks (like delta function, but not infinity sharp), not as a continuous spectrum.

I see, thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top