How Does Projectile Motion Relate to Speed and Distance Graphs?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between projectile motion and various speed and distance graphs derived from a practical experiment involving a ball rolling down a slope. The speed vs. time graph produced a straight line, indicating that velocity is proportional to time, though the acceleration may differ from 9.8 m/s² due to the incline. The vertical distance vs. time graph was exponential, and while the participant suggested an inverse relationship, it was clarified that the correct equation is s = ut + 0.5at², which describes non-linear motion. Lastly, the distance vs. t² graph produced a straight line, confirming that distance increases with time squared, aligning with the equation s = at². Overall, the participant seeks clarification and deeper understanding of these relationships in projectile motion.
Zel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I did a practicle to show the path of a projectile by rolling a ball down a slope. The graph produced was exponential. The time (tics, time intervals), vertical distance (from starting position) and speed (distance/time) were calculated.

1. Draw a graph of speed vs time (time on x, speed on y)
It produced a straight line. It then asked what this indicates about projectile motion, and how does it correlate with the equations used for projectile motion.
I said that v is proportional to t, as when time increases, so does velocity. I used the equation v = u + at, where u = 0, and a can be gravity, so v = 9.8t ... so v increases at a constant rate. Would this be correct?

2. Draw the graph of vertical distance vs time (time on x, distance on y). It produced an exponential, with the curve increasing upwards as x increases.It then asked what this indicates about projectile motion, and how does it correlate with the equations used for projectile motion.
I said that d is inversely proportional to t, as when t increases, d does in a non-linear fashion. I need help finding an equation for this though.

3. Draw a graph of distance vs t^2 (t^2 on x, d on y). It produced a straight line. It asks to explain the meaning of the graph, so i used s=ut+0.5at^2, u = 0, so s = at^2, so as time increases, so does distance... would this be correct?

Any help or advice given would be GREATLY appreciated
Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.
Zel said:
I did a practicle to show the path of a projectile by rolling a ball down a slope. The graph produced was exponential. The time (tics, time intervals), vertical distance (from starting position) and speed (distance/time) were calculated.

1. Draw a graph of speed vs time (time on x, speed on y)
It produced a straight line. It then asked what this indicates about projectile motion, and how does it correlate with the equations used for projectile motion.
I said that v is proportional to t, as when time increases, so does velocity. I used the equation v = u + at, where u = 0, and a can be gravity, so v = 9.8t ... so v increases at a constant rate. Would this be correct?
Pretty much, though if the object was rolling down an incline then a won't be 9.8 m/s2. You can figure out what a is by getting the slope of the v-vs-t graph.
2. Draw the graph of vertical distance vs time (time on x, distance on y). It produced an exponential, with the curve increasing upwards as x increases.It then asked what this indicates about projectile motion, and how does it correlate with the equations used for projectile motion.
I said that d is inversely proportional to t, as when t increases, d does in a non-linear fashion. I need help finding an equation for this though.
You already have the equation, it's the "s=ut+0.5at^2" that you give below. Note, this is neither an exponential nor an inverse proportion, but it is a type of equation you would have studied in algebra.
3. Draw a graph of distance vs t^2 (t^2 on x, d on y). It produced a straight line. It asks to explain the meaning of the graph, so i used s=ut+0.5at^2, u = 0, so s = at^2, so as time increases, so does distance... would this be correct?
It's correct, but your teacher might be looking for more than that. I'm a little puzzled by the phrase "explain the meaning of the graph", is that the exact wording of the question?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top