How Does Reducing Distance Affect Tangential Speed in Rotating Space Modules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MKM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Speed
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, two space modules connected by a massless cable rotate around their center of mass, initially moving at a tangential speed of 7.98 m/s. As the modules pull together, reducing their distance by a factor of three, the final tangential speed needs to be determined. The key concept is that angular momentum is conserved during this process, not energy. The initial confusion about using linear kinematics was clarified, leading to the realization that the final speed can be calculated using the conservation of angular momentum. Ultimately, the correct approach was identified, resolving the initial uncertainty.
MKM
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
In outer space two space modules are joined together by a massless cable. These probes are rotating about their center of mass, which is at the center of the wire, because the modules are identical (see the drawing). In each probe, the cable is connected to a motor, so that the modules can pull each other together. The initial tangential speed of each module is v0 = 7.98 m/s. Then they pull together until the distance between them is reduced by a factor of 3. Determine the final tangential speed, which is vf for each module.


sorry I know it seems like I hav soo many questions but this chapter ha been confusing for me. I amd assuming that I can use the formula from linear inematics which is velocity squared = inivital velocity +2 g 3 I get 8.17 m/s I don;t bleive this is correct though
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: What quantity is conserved as the modules are pulled in?
 
Do you mean the energy? or the velocity it self?
 
Hint: Energy is not conserved! (A motor is required to pull the modules in.)
 
Hey thanks I finally found it !
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top