How Does Relativistic Motion Affect Newton's Second Law?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation F = dp/dt = gamma^3 * m * a for a relativistic system, starting from the momentum equation p = gamma * m * v(t). The user attempts to differentiate momentum with respect to time using the product and chain rules, leading to a complex expression. Guidance is provided to simplify the expression by combining terms over a common denominator of (1 - v(t)^2/c^2)^(3/2). The user acknowledges the helpful advice, indicating that they had overlooked this straightforward approach. The conversation emphasizes the application of relativistic principles to Newton's second law.
limiss
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that F=dp/dt=gamma^3*m*a for a relativistic system
assumption: force, motion in same direction


Homework Equations



p = gamma*m*v(t)
gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v(t)^2/c^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



p= v(t)*m/sqrt(1-v(t)^2/c^2)

using product rule then chain rule
dp/dt= (1/sqrt(1-v(t)^2/c^2) + (v(t)/c)^2/(1-v(t)^2/c^2)^3/2)*m*dv/dt

dv/dt= a

how do i get m*a*gamma^3 from this??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just put the two terms over the common denominator of (1-v(t)^2/c^2)^3/2 and combine them. You are almost there.
 
Dick said:
Just put the two terms over the common denominator of (1-v(t)^2/c^2)^3/2 and combine them. You are almost there.

thanks... i had tried everything except the obvious which you just stated.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top