How Does Relativity Affect Information Exchange Between Moving Observers?

SevenTowers
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
This is a question to which I haven't found an answer anywhere, so I'm probably seeing this wrong but I can't seem to figure it out.
I realize time is warped relative to speed, what I don't understand is the following:
-Considering 2 people, A and B. Let us say that A is stationary and B is moving away from A at a speed very close to that of light (such as the famous twin paradox).
-Now consider that A is emitting an information bearing, electromagnetic signal towards B.
-The way I see it, while B is moving away from A, it is receiving a red shifted beam of information. B is "learning" a lot slower than if he were at rest.
-Now let B turn around at some point and move towards A at the same speed as he was moving away. B is now receiving a blue shifted signal and is "learning" at very fast pace.
-When B finally reaches A, he will have been subjected to all the information broadcasted by A, but at some point will have received it a lot faster, and at some point a lot slower.
- If B's time is running a lot slower as it is proven to, and A has broadcasted one year of his life, does this mean that B has seen everything that has happened in fast forward all the time? Even though the signal was red shifted for half of his trip?
I can't seem to put together the idea of an information exchange with time compression... I visualize electromagnetic waves as constant speed separated crests, which naturally seem closer together if you're traveling towards them, and further apart if you are traveling away.
In the same way, if B is sending EM waves while coming closer to A, A will receive a compressed signal followed from very close by the arrival of B (lets say B is traveling at 99.999999% of c)...
I know a drawing would help but if somebody understands what I'm trying to say could you please enlighten me? Thanx :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You might find this particular subsection of the sci.physics.faq helpful

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_doppler.html

But i'll give a thumbnail sketch of what the traveller sees. The doppler shift factor, k is a function of velocity. So let's say that the doppler shift factor is 10:1.

On the outbound trip, B travels for some time period (let's say 1 year, to make it simple), at a doppler shift factor of 10, and sees the signals from .1 years of events on the planet.

On the inbound trip, B travels 1 year at a doppler shfit factor of 10, and since it turns out that the doppler shift factor is the recirpocal of what he saw on the outgoing trip - so he sees 10 years of signal in his 1 year return trip.

The net result is that B, on a 2 year trip, has seen 10.1 years elapse for the person who stayed behind.

When we look at the relativistic equations, this checks. The doppler shift factor is \sqrt{\frac{c+v}{c-v}

ref:
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/DopplerEffect.html

So if your velocity is (99/101)*c, you will experience a doppler factor of 10 (substitute and check - also substitue v= -(99/101)*c into the formula above, and see that the doppler shift factor is indeed .1 on the outbound trip).

The formula for relativistic time dilation is

gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}

If you substitute v=(99/101) * c in the above expression, you get a gamma of 5.05.

This checks - B has traveled 2 years, and with a time dilation factor of 5.05, we expect that 2*5.05 = 10.1 years have elapsed on earth. Which is the same result we found earlier.
 



Hi there,

Thank you for sharing your thoughts and questions about visualizing relativity. I can see that you have a good understanding of the concepts involved, but there are a few things that I would like to clarify.

Firstly, in your scenario, A is not actually stationary. In order for B to be moving away from A at a speed close to the speed of light, A must also be moving at a significant speed in the opposite direction. This is because in relativity, there is no absolute reference frame and all motion is relative. So, in this scenario, both A and B are moving away from each other at close to the speed of light.

Now, let's look at the scenario of B turning around and moving towards A at the same speed. In this case, B is still receiving a red-shifted signal, but it is not the same signal that A originally sent. This is because the signal sent by A has also been affected by time dilation. So, when B turns around and moves towards A, he is actually receiving a new, blue-shifted signal that is being sent by A at the same time that B is moving towards A. This signal will be received by B at a faster pace because B is now moving towards the source of the signal.

To answer your question about whether B will see everything that has happened in fast forward, the answer is no. This is because B's perception of time is different from A's. While B may perceive time as moving faster, it is still moving at a slower pace compared to A. So, B will not see everything in fast forward, but rather at a slightly faster pace than A.

I hope this helps to clarify your understanding of relativity and how information exchange is affected by time dilation and the relative motion of objects. Keep exploring and asking questions, as it is a great way to deepen your understanding of complex concepts like relativity.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top