How Does Reversing Current Affect Magnetic Field Directions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter psyclone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how reversing current affects the directions of magnetic fields B1 and B2 in relation to charged particles. It emphasizes that changing the sign of the current does not inherently change the direction of B1, and that both electric field E and magnetic field B1 do not need to be reversed simultaneously. The Lorentz force equation is highlighted as a fundamental concept to understand the interactions between electric and magnetic fields with charged particles. The participants agree that B2 must be reversed, but there is confusion regarding the necessity of reversing E and B1. Ultimately, the conversation clarifies that while reversing both E and B1 is not required, it can still yield correct results.
psyclone
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Please refer to attachment for solution.

Can you help with the following (please refer to attached). If I understand the problem, both magnetic fields B1 & B2 need to change direction, due to the change in current (I) by replacing the positive with a negative ion.

Your thoughts,

Homework Equations



Right hand rule for Current, Magnetic Field, Force.

The Attempt at a Solution


Please refer to attached for solution.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Ps,

I understand your reasoning for ##\vec B_2##.

Then it becomes confusing: Either you change the sign of I or you change the direction; not both.
And just changing "the sign of the current" (i.e. the charge of the ions) does not change the direction of ##\vec B_1## !
And I also don't see how changing only the "the sign of the current" (i.e. the charge of the ions) does not change the direction of ##\vec F_E##.

You also want to keep in mind what the function of ##\vec E## and ##\vec B_1## is: together they act as a velocity selector: particles with a certain ##|v|## experience no force whatsoever and pass straight through S3.


Perhaps you'll do well to base your thinking on the expression for the Lorentz force $$
\vec F = q\;(\vec E + \vec v \times \vec B)
$$which is very, very fundamental, instead of on all these derived equations that require memorizing and can become confusing (as happens here). Two threads: here and here , might help (in all modesty... ahem :rolleyes:).
 
So what your saying, If the cross product of v & B is equivalent to a force. Then the electric field must be reversed, when a negative ion is introduced, to have zero net forces acting on the ion. please find attached.
 

Attachments

No! :nb)

v is the actual velocity of the particles (the time derivative of the position). No sign confusion because of charge possible (that is sitting in the q).If the force has to be zero for a certain v so that these particles go straight through S3, and the force is ##
\vec F = q\;(\vec E + \vec v \times \vec B)
## for a charge q, then what is the force for a charge -q ?

Your last sentence is weird: both E and B2 ? We are discussing E and B1 !

We already concluded B2 must be reversed.
 
Last edited:
B2 needs to be reversed I agree. And we are discussing E and B1, but I was referring to all the fields that needed to be changed, mentioned in the question.
 
The maker of the exercise took care to not include an answer where all three are reversed (something many ignorant folks would pick without much thought) ; that way the exercise has a bit more selective power :)

Is it now really clear to you that reversing bot E and B1 isn't necessary, even though it will work all right ?
 
view attachment :mad:
 

Attachments

Pictures look splendid. Accompanying text: ? ? (if it's adjusted for a positive particle with speed v, then it will also let through a negative particle with the same speed v).
 
Back
Top